The Law of Full Control of Debt Security Objects by Murtahin Perspective Wahbah az-Zuhaili (Study in Riau, Indonesia)

  • Tiara Nabila Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
  • Mustafa Khamal Rokan Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia
Keywords: Law of Control, Object of Debt Collateral, Wahbah Az-Zuhaili

Abstract

This research aims to find out the law related to the occurrence of full control of the debt collateral object by the murtahin (debt giver). The method used in this research is an empirical juridical research method obtained through interviews. As for the research location in Bathin Betuah Village, Mandau District, Bengkalis Regency, Riau, the perspective used is the opinion of Wahbah az-Zuhaili. The approach used is a conceptual approach . The research results show that control of the debt collateral object may not be fully controlled by the murtahin. This is because Rahin is unable to pay his debt installments, always asks for time to pay his debts, and does not keep his promise to pay at the specified time. Murtahin's full control of the debt collateral object must not be separated from its original owner (Ar-Raahin) and Al-Murtahin may not own it, when Ar-Raahin is unable to redeem it at the specified time. The solution offered when Rahin is no longer able to pay the debt is that the proceeds from the sale of the collateral object are to pay the debt. If the debt has been paid off and there is an excess (remaining) then it becomes the property of Rahin (the borrower). According to Wahbah az-Zuhaili, the practice of controlling debt collateral completely by murtahin is not permitted or is haram.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdulkadir, M. (2004). Law And Legal Research. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Badrulzaman, MD (1991). Bank Credit Agreement. Bandung: Citra Aditya.

Language, T. P. (2005). Big Indonesian Dictionary. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Gatot, S. (2009). Banking And Credit Issues. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Harsono, B. (2005). Indonesian Agrarian Law Concerning the Formation of Basic Agrarian Laws. Jakarta: Trisakti University.

Hasan, MA (2000). Masail Fiqiyah Zakat, Pajar, Insurance and Financial Institutions. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Janwari, Y. (2015). Sharia Financial Institutions. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

S, HM (2010). Analysis of Warehouse Receipt Warranty Rights as a Form of Credit Guarantee Binding in Banking Institutions. Depok: University of Indonesia Thesis.

Sabiq, S. (2006). Sunnah Fiqh. Jakarta: Pena Pundi Aksara.

Sumarni. (2018). The Level Of Risk Involved Must Be Known And Considered By Both Parties. Parepare: Central Library of Islamic Institute of Parepare.

Supramono, G. (2009). Banking And Credit Issues. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Toha, M. (2019). Derivatif Versus Ekonomi Syariah. Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 2(1), 91-102. https://doi.org/10.31538/iijse.v2i1.328

az-Zuhaili, W. (2011). al-Fiqh al-Islamu Wa Adilatuhu (Vol. V). Depok: Gema Insani.

Published
2023-12-10
How to Cite
Nabila, T., & Khamal Rokan, M. (2023). The Law of Full Control of Debt Security Objects by Murtahin Perspective Wahbah az-Zuhaili (Study in Riau, Indonesia). Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 7(1), 130-140. https://doi.org/10.31538/iijse.v7i1.4417