Analysis of the Constitutional Court's Ruling against the Legalization of Medical Cannabis and its Practice in Maqashid
Abstract
Medicine is one of the most important things in human life. Many substances can be used as medicine, including marijuana. In this case, according to the decision of the constitutional court, permission was not granted for the medical use of marijuana for various reasons. Even though developed countries like America have allowed the use of marijuana as a medicine. Health services in our country can be said to be quite up-to-date in terms of human resources, however when it comes to granting permits to use marijuana as a source it is not permitted either by general law or by religious law. The many opinions and statements from legal observers and religious leaders make this matter still a matter of debate. Some say that the use of marijuana as a medicine is not a problem if it is still under the supervision of health experts and some say it is not yet the time to allow it because marijuana is a class 1 narcotic, which means it has a very high level of dependence on its users. The Constitutional Court also rejected the use of marijuana as a source of health services because human resources in Indonesia have not been able to accept marijuana as a health service tool, considering and considering the widespread use of narcotics freely, and to date, this has not been addressed by the Government.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, Amin. (2012). Epistemologi Keilmuan Kalam Dan Fikih Dalam Merespon Perubahan Di Era Negara-Negara Dan Globalisasi Pemikiran Filsafat Keilmuan Agama Islam Jasser Auda. Media Syariah, 14(2).
BNN. (2020). Badan Narkotika Nasional Kota Banda Aceh.
Christianto, Hwian. (2011). Penafsiran Hukum Progresif Dalam Perkara Pidana. Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, 23(3).
Dramanda, Wicaksana. (2014). Menggagas Penerapan Judicial Restraint Di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 11(4).
Faqih, Mariadi. (2010). Nilai-Nilai Filosofi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Yang Final Dan Mengikat. Jurnal Konstitusi Mahkamah Konstitusi, 7(3).
Fauzan Ni’ami dan Bustamin, Muhammad. (2021). Maqasid Asy-Syari’ah Dalam Tinjauan Pemikiran Ibnu ‘Asyur Dan Jasser Auda. Jurnal Ilmiah Syari’ah, 20(1).
Gunawan, Dwi Putri. (2022). “Legislasi dan Masalah: Studi Pemanfaatan Ganja untuk Pengobatan Medis”. Ijtihad. 38 (1), 38.
Gumanti, Retna. (2018). Maqashid Al-Syariah Menurut Jasser Auda (Pendekatan Sistem Dalam Hukum Islam). Jurnal Al-Himaya, 2(1).
Helim, Abdul dan Aris Sunandar Suradilaga. (2022). Penggunaan Metode Maqasid Syariah Sebagai Alat Analisis. Jurnal Studi Agama dan Masyarakat, 18(1).
Iqbal Fasa, Muhammad. (2016). Reformasi Pemahaman Teori Maqasid Syariah Analisis Pendekatan Sistem Jasser Auda. Hunafa: Jurnal Studia Islamika, Vol. 13, No. 02.
Jumantoro, T, M,A& Amin, S, M. (2009). Kamus Ilmu Ushul Fiqh. Jakarta: Amzah.
M. Wantu, Fence. (2013). Kendala Hakim Dalam Menciptakan Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan, Dan Kemanfaatan Di Peradilan Perdata. Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, 25(2).
Marzuki, Laica. (2004). Judicial Review Di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 1 (3).
Malik, S., Manalu, L., &Juniarti, R. (2020). Legalisasi Ganja Dalam Sektor Medis Perspektif Hukum. Jurnal Rechten: Riset Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 2(2) 1-2.
Meliala, Habibie Sembiring. (2013). Muzakkiroh fi Ushulil Fiqhi. Medan: Ar-Raudhatul Hasanah.
Miskari. Politik Hukum Islam Dan Maqashid Al-Syariah. (2019). Jurnal Al-Imarah, 4(1).
Mukhidin. (2014). Hukum Progresif Sebagai Solusi Hukum Yang Mensejahterakan Rakyat. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 1(3).
Nuryadi, Deni. (2016). Teori Hukum Progresif Dan Penerapannya Di Indonesia, Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum De’Jure: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum, 1(2).
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 106/PUU-XVIII/2020
Qadrina, N., & Risal, M. C. (2022). Legalisasi Ganja Sebagai Tanaman Obat: Perlukah? Jurnal Al Tasyri’iyyah, 2(1) 1-2.
Toha, M., & Rozikin, K. (2020). Implementasi Maqasid Al-Shari’ah Dalam Manajemen Strategis Syariah. JES (Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah), 5(1). https://doi.org/10.30736/jesa.v5i1.75
Utami, I.W., & Arfiani, N. (2022). Pengunaan Ganja Medis Dalam Pengobatan Rasional Dan Pengaturannya Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Dan Etika Kesehatan, 2(1) 63-65.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. (2005). Hukum Progresif: Hukum Yang Membebaskan. Jurnal Hukum Progresif Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Univ Diponegoro I, 1(1).
Yakubu, A., & Isbahi, M. (2022). A Conceptual Analysis: The Inclusion of Elder-Care Funding in Contemporary Waqf Revival in Nigeria. Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 5(2), 409-421. https://doi.org/10.31538/iijse.v5i2.2238
Copyright (c) 2024 Ahmad Maulana Lingga, Irwansyah Irwansyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
