Understanding Why Insurance Companies Do Not Spin Off Sharia Business Units from the Corporate Entrepreneurship Angle Post the Issuance of the Financial Sector Development and Strengthening Law (PPSK Law)
Abstract
Based on the results of situational analysis, problematic situations, strategies, and the proposed model as explained above, several conclusions can be drawn. The high number of Muslim people in Indonesia encourages companies to innovate in creating new products that are easier for the public to understand, especially related to Sharia insurance. The existing condition of the insurance industry is driven by the real growth trend of Sharia insurance customers, which can be used as a measure of industry growth. When compared with other countries, there are similarities and differences between Sharia and conventional insurance governance. This can be used as a comparative reference to optimize the management of the Sharia insurance industry. Based on the results of the situation analysis, it is known that the current condition of the Sharia insurance industry is not optimal because there has been no serious effort from the regulator to integrate all potential from upstream to downstream in all elements of the Sharia insurance industry. From the results of the interview analysis, it was revealed that the strategy considered to be the most effective and the main priority in developing the Sharia insurance industry is increasing human resource competency through intensive and continuous training. This aims to overcome the shortage of professional human resources in the fields of insurance and sharia economics while ensuring quality improvement.
Downloads
References
AAUI. Asosiasi Asuransi Umum. (2018). Statistik Asuransi Umum
Adler PS, Kwon SW. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review. 27: 17–40.
Aldrich H, Fiol M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of Industri Creation. Academy of Management Review. 19: 645–670.
Anderson B, Kreiser PM, Kuratko DF, Hornsby JS, Eshima Y. (2014). Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial orientation. Business. 1154 May. doi:10.1002/smj.
Anderson BS, Covin JG, Slevin DP. (2009). Understanding the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and strategic learning capability: an empirical investigation. Strateg Entrep J. 3(3):218–240. doi:10.1002/sej.72. Arrow KJ. 1985. The Economics Of Agency. In J. W. Pratt & R. J. Zeckhauser (Eds.), Principals and agents: The structure of business. Boston (US): Harvard Business School Press.
Ayuni, P., & Ahmadi Bi Rahmani, N. (2023). The Influence of Agent Competence and Trust on Customer Loyalty to Sharia Life Insurance (Study at PT. Prudential Life Assurance Binjai Branch. Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 6(2), 682-701. https://doi.org/10.31538/iijse.v6i2.3325
Barney J. (1991). Special theory forum the resource-based model of the firm: origins, implications, and prospects. J Manage. 17(1): 97–98. doi:10.1177/014920639101700107.
Bierwerth M, Schwens C, Isidor R, Kabst R. (2015). Corporate entrepreneurship and Performance: A meta-analysis. Small Bus Econ. 45(2): 255–278. doi:10.1007/s11187-015-9629-1.
Boeckh PA. (1990). Philological Hermenetics-The Heurmenetics Reader. New York (US): The Continum Publishing Company.
Brauer, Matthias. (2006). What have we acquired and what should we acquire in divestiture research? a review and research agenda. Journal of Management. 32(6): 751-785.
Chandra, Yanto. (2018). Mapping the Evolution of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research (1990-2013): A Scientometric Analysis. PLoS ONE. 13: 1- 12.
Checkland PB, Scholes J. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. England (UK): John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Checkland P, John P. (2006). Learning for Action: A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology and its use for Practitioners, Teachers, and Students. England (UK): John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Chienwattanasook K, Wattanapongphasuk S, Prianto AL, Jermsittiparsert K. (2019). Corporate entrepreneurship and business performance of logistic companies in Indonesia. Ind Eng Manag Syst. 18(3): 541–550. doi:10.7232/iems.2019.18.3.541.
Covin JG, Lumpkin GT. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation theory and research: Reflections on a needed construct. Entrep Theory Pract. 35(5):855–872. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00482.x.
Creswell, John W, Clark VLP. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. New York (US): SAGE Publications
Dalton DR, Hitt MA, Certo ST, Dalton CM. (2007). The Fundamental Agency Problem And Its Mitigation. In J. F. Walsh & References 357 A. P. Brief (Eds.), Academy of Management Annals (Vol. 1, pp. 1–64). Mahwah, NJ (US): Erlbaum.
Dess GG, Lumpkin GT. (2005). Research briefs. Acad Manag Exec. 19(1):147–156. doi:10.1177/002248718203300610.
Dess GG, Lumpkin GT. (2005). The role of entrepreneurial orientation in stimulating effective corporate entrepreneurship. Acad Manag Exec. 19(1):147–156. doi:10.1177/002248718203300610.
Dess GG, Lumpkin GT, Mcgee JE. (1999). Linking corporate entrepreneurship to strategy, structure, and process: suggested research directions. Entrep Theory Pract. 23(3): 85–102. doi:10.1177/104225879902300306.
Drucker, Peter F. 1985. Innovation and Entrepreneurship Practice and Principles. New York (US): Harper & Row, Publiser, Inc.
Eisenhardt KM. (1989). Agency theory: an assessment and review. Acad ManagRev. 14(1):57–74. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279003.
Giddens A. (1976). New Rules Of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique Of Interpretative Sociologies. London (UK): Hutchinson.
Giddens A. (1979). Central Problems In Social Theory: Action, Structure, And Contradiction In Social Analysis. London (UK): Macmillan.
Giddens A. (1984). The Constitution Of Society: Outline Of The Theory Of Structuration. Cambridge (UK): Polity
Hardjosoekarto S. (2012). Construction of Social Development Index as a Theoretical Research Practice in Action Research by Using Soft Systems Methodology. Syst Pract Action Res. 25:493–509
Hardjosoekarto S. (2012). Soft Systems Methodology (Metodologi Serba Sistem Lunak). Jakarta (ID): Universitas Indonesia Press.
Holmstrom B. (1979). Moral hazard and observability. Bell Journal of Economics. 10: 74–91.
Hornsby JS, Kuratko DF, Holt DT, Wales WJ. (2013). Assessing a measurement of organizational preparedness for corporate entrepreneurship. J Prod Innov Manag. 30(5):937–955. doi:10.1111/jpim.12038.
Jensen MC. (1983). Organization theory and methodology. Accounting Review. 58: 319–339
Ireland RD, Covin JG, Kuratko DF. (2009). Conceptualizing corporate entrepreneurship strategy. ET&P J.(979):1000.
Ireland RD, Hitt MA, Sirmon DG. 2003. A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions. J Manage. 29(6):963–989. doi:10.1016/S0149- 2063(03)00086-2.
Kahija YFL. (2017). Penelitian Fenomenologis Jalan Memahami Pengalaman Hidup. Yogyakarta (ID): PT Kanisius.
Kostova T, Roth K, Dacin MT. (2008). Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique and new directions. Academy of Management Review. 33: 994–1006.
Kreiser PM, Davis J. (2010). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: the unique impact of innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk-taking. J SmallBus Entrep. 23(1):39–51. doi:10.1080/08276331.2010.10593472.
Kuratko DF, Audretsch DB. (2013). Clarifying the domains of corporate entrepreneurship. Int Entrep Manag J. 9(3):323–335. doi:10.1007/s11365- 013-0257-4.
Kuratko DF, Hornsby JS, Covin JG. (2014). Diagnosing a firm’s internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship. Bus Horiz. 57(1):37–47. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2013.08.009.
Kuratko DF, Neubert E. (2018). Corporate entrepreneurial leadership: Addressing critical challenges in a disruptive age. Adv Study Entrep Innov Econ Growth. 28:89–109. doi:10.1108/S1048-473620180000028004.
Ladik DM, Stewart DW. (2008). The contribution continuum. Journal of the academic marketing science. 36(2): 157-165.
Lumpkin GT, Dess GG. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Acad Manag Rev. 21(1):135–172. doi:10.5465/AMR.1996.9602161568.
Lumpkin GT, Dess, Gregory G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: the moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing. 16: 429–451
Marimin. (2017). Sistem Pendukung Pengambilan Keputusan dan Sistem Pakar. Bogor (ID): IPB Press.
Marimin dan Maghfiroh, Nurul. (2013). Aplikasi Teknik Pengambilan Keputusan dalam Manajemen Rantai Pasok. Bogor (ID): IPB Press.
Martens, Cristina Dai Prá; Lacerda, Fabrício Martins; Belfort, Ana Claudia dan de Freitas, Henrique Mello Rodrigues. (2016). Research on entrepreneurial orientation: current status and future agenda. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. 22(4): 1-28
Mckay J, Peter M. (2001). The dual imperatives of action research. Information Technology & People. 14(1): 46-59. MCB University Press.http://www.emerald-library.com/ft
Miles AJ. (2012). Management and Organization Theory. San Francisco (US): John Wiley & Sons, Inc
||OJK|. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2021). Statistik Perasuransian 2019. Jakarta (ID): OJK.
Petersen T. (1993). The economics of organizations: The principal-agent relationship. Acta Sociologica. 36: 277–293.
Redja G, McNamara MJ, Rabel WH. (2021). Principles of Risk Management and Insurance. Essex (UK): Pearson Education Limited
Saaty RW. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used. Math Model. 9(3–5):161–176. doi:10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8.
Sari, A., & Nasution, Y. S. J. (2023). Analysis of the Application of Utmost Good Faith Principles in Personal Accident Insurance Agreements (Case Study of PT Asuransi Askrida Syariah Medan Branch). Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 6(2), 848-869. https://doi.org/10.31538/iijse.v6i2.3641
Sasongko, F. N., & Rachma, E. (2021). The Effect of Financial Performance on ROA Projected as Profitability. Majapahit Journal of Islamic Finance and Management, 1(1), 60-74. https://doi.org/10.31538/mjifm.v1i1.5
Schindehutte M, Morris MH, Kuratko DF. (2018a). Unpacking corporate entrepreneurship: A critique and extension. Adv Study Entrep Innov Econ Growth. 28:11–35. doi:10.1108/S1048-473620180000028001.
Schindehutte M, Morris MH, Kuratko DF, Schindehutte M, Morris MH, Kuratko DF. (2018b). The Challenges of Corporate Entrepreneurship in the Chapter 1 Unpacking Corporate Entrepreneurship : A Critique and Extension.
Scott WR. (1995). Institutions And Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA (US): Sage.
Setiawan H, Erdogan B. (2020). Key factors for successful corporate entrepreneurship: a study of Indonesian contractors. Int J Constr Manag. 20(3): 252–268. doi:10.1080/15623599.2018.1484849.
Sharma P, Chrisman SJJ. (2007). Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrep Concepts, Theory Perspect.,
Sushil. (1997). Flexible systems management: An evolving paradigm’, Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 14(4): 259–275.
Sushil. (2012). Interpreting the interpretive structural model. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management (June 2012). 13(2):87–106.
Sushil. (2015). Strategic flexibility: The evolving paradigm of strategic management. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management. 16(2): 113–114.
Tjiptono F. (2011). Brand Longevity. Yogyakarta (ID): Penerbit Andi
Uchiyama K. (2009). A concise theoretical grounding of action research: based on Checkland’s soft systems methodology and Kimura’s phenomenological psychiatry. Tokyo: The Institute of Business, Daito Bunka University.
Van Wyk R, Adonisi M. (2012). Antecedents of corporate entrepreneurship. South African J Bus Manag. 43(3): 65–78. doi:10.4102/sajbm.v43i3.475.
Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ (US): Princeton University Press.
William JW, Sascha K, Matthias F, Christoph S, Jeffrey GC. (2020). The status quo of research on entrepreneurial orientation: Conversational landmarks and theoretical scaffolding. Journal of Business Research. 128(2021): 564–577 Zahra SA. 1993a. Environment, corporate entrepreneurship, and financial performance A taxonomic approach. J Bus Ventur. 8(4): 319–340. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(93)90003-N.
Zahra SA. (1993b). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior: a critique and extension. Entrep Theory Pract. 17(4): 5–21. doi:10.1177/104225879301700401.
Zahra SA. (1996). Governance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating impact of industry technological opportunities. Acad Manag J. 39(6):1713–1735. doi:10.2307/257076.
Zahra SA. (2018). Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms: the wellspring of the regenerative capability. Fam Bus Rev. 31(2):216–226. doi:10.1177/0894486518776871.
Zahra SA, Covin JG. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship- performance performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. J Bus Ventur. 10(1):43–58. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(94)00004-E.
Copyright (c) 2024 Dadi Adriana, Hartoyo Hartoyo, Rizal Syarief, Elisa Anggraeni

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.