Legal Protection of Alternate Universe Authors Against Plagiarism Reviewed from MUI Fatwa No. 1/MUNAS VII/MUI/5/2005 (Case Study of Twitter Application)

  • Yhossy rizky akbar Universitas islam negeri sumatera utara
  • Mustapa Khamal Rokan Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

Abstract

This research aims to determine the legal protection for creators of alternate universe (AU) works whose works are plagiarized on Twitter social media based on the MUI Fatwa and to examine and analyze the ideal legal protection against acts of plagiarism of AU works. This research uses qualitative methods with content analysis research on social media regarding AU plagiarism on Twitter. This writing shows that there are regulations that guarantee legal certainty regarding copyright for writers who publish their stories on Twitter social media, which have been stipulated in Indonesian legal regulations.MUI Fatwa NO. 1/MUNAS VII/MUI/5/2005 concerning intellectual property rights, works containing forms must be given legal protection and the act of using, disclosing, making, using, selling, importing, exporting, circulating, handing over, providing, announcing, reproducing, plagiarizing, counterfeiting, hijacking other people's IPR without rights is injustice and is haram. The legal protection (mashun) is the same as mal (wealth). This fatwa underlines the importance of respecting copyright, maintaining intellectual integrity, and preventing acts of plagiarism. In the context of plagiarism cases on Twitter, the legal function is to protect, not only morally but also to protect and ethically regarding the consequences of plagiarism. The MUI fatwa contains norms that protect property rights holders. This provides a strong moral basis for society and Alternate universe authors to avoid or treat plagiarism seriously, along with a positive legal view that also protects intellectual property rights.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdulkadir. (2001). Kajian Hukum Ekonomi HKI. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Aziz, L. A., Irhandayaningsih, A., & Kurniawan, A. T. (2015). Upaya perpustakaan dalam mengurangi plagiarisme pada karya ilmiah mahasiswa (Studi kasus di UPT Perpustakaan UNIKA Soegijapranata). Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan, 4(3), 131-140.

Djumhana, M., & Djubaedillah, R. (2003). Hak Milik Intelektual Sejarah, Teori dan Prakteknya di Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Filcha, A., & Hayaty, M. (2019). Implementasi Algoritma Rabin-Karp untuk Pendeteksi Plagiarisme pada Dokumen Tugas Mahasiswa. JUITA: Jurnal Informatika, 7(1), 25-32.

Hayyan. (den 29 Agustus 2022). Berbagai Dampak Plagiarisme Yang Penting Untuk Diketahui, Jangan Sampai Anda Seperti Ini. Hämtat från BeritaMandalikaCom: https://mandalika.pikiran-rakyat.com/gaya-hidup/pr-2775384217/berbagai-dampak-plagiarisme-yang-penting-untuk-diketahui-jangan-sampai-anda-seperti-ini den 4 Oktober 2023

Joan. (den 29 Desember 2021). Dampak Buruk Plagiarisme dan Bagaimana Cara Menghindarinya. Hämtat från toffeedev: https://toffeedev.com/blog/dampak-plagiarisme/ den 4 Oktober 2023

Kustiwi, N. (2014). Motivasi dan Perilaku Plagiat di Kalangan Siswa SMA: Persepsi siswa terhadap perilaku plagiat dan motivasi siswa dalam melakukan tindak plagiat di kalangan siswa SMA Cita Hati Surabaya. Jurnal Universitas Airlangga, 3(2), 569-587.

Ma, H., Lu, E. Y., Turner, S., & et al. (2007). An Empirical Investigation of Digital Cheating and Plagiarism Among Middle School Students. American Secondary Education, 35(2), 69-82.

Maimun, E. K., & Rachmani, T. N. (2022). Pengaruh Fiksi Penggemar: Alternative Universe (AU) dalam Meningkatkan Minat Baca Remaja Indonesia (Studi kasus pembaca Alternative Universe pada fandom treasure makers). DIALEKTIKA: jurnal bahasa, sastra, dan pendidikan bahasa dan sastra Indonesia, 9(1), 37-55.

Rongiyati, S. (2016). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Atas Pengetahuan Tradisional. Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan, 2(2), 213-238.

Saidin, D. (1997). Aspek Hukum HKI (Intellectual Property Right). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Subroto, M. A., & Suprapedi. (2005). Eksplorasi Konsep Kekayaan Intelektual untuk Menumbuhkan Inovasi. Jakarta: LIPI Perss.

Toha, M. (2019). Derivatif Versus Ekonomi Syariah. Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 2(1), 91-102. https://doi.org/10.31538/iijse.v2i1.328

Toha, M., Ulfa, E., & Yanti Sandra Dewi, N. (2021). Analysis of The Implementation of Sharia Strategy Management at BMT Maslahah. Majapahit Journal of Islamic Finance and Management, 1(1), 29-40. https://doi.org/10.31538/mjifm.v1i1.3

Published
2024-02-09
How to Cite
akbar, Y., & Khamal Rokan, M. (2024). Legal Protection of Alternate Universe Authors Against Plagiarism Reviewed from MUI Fatwa No. 1/MUNAS VII/MUI/5/2005 (Case Study of Twitter Application). Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 7(1), 1521-1540. https://doi.org/10.31538/iijse.v7i1.4704