Examining Money Laundering in the Insurance Industry Through Fraud Heptagon Theory Perspective

  • Fadilah Fajar Bagaskara Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Harti Budi Yanti Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: Money Laundering, Fraud Heptagon Theory, Anti Money Laundering, Insurance Industry

Abstract

Based on the principle of insurable interest, individuals and organizations enter into insurance agreements with the primary objective of securing protection against potential financial losses caused by unforeseen risks. However, according to various literature, insurance can also be utilized as a financial instrument for money laundering activities. This study aims to uncover potential indicators that may serve as opportunities for money laundering, analyzed through the lens of the Fraud Heptagon Theory, which includes the aspects of pressure, opportunity, rationalization, competence, arrogance, culture, and religion. This research employs a qualitative methodology with an interview approach, targeting individuals working within the insurance industry, such as insurance companies (internal auditors, insurance agents, underwriters), insurance brokers, and reinsurance companies to gain insights into the complex trade schemes. The implementation of Anti-Money Laundering (AML) measures is crucial to minimize the potential for money laundering and to ensure compliance with existing regulations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albrecht, W. (2012). Fraud Examination. South Western: Cengage Learning.

Ananda, K. P., Purnamasari, P., & Gunawan, H. (2016). Pengaruh Pengendalian Internal dan Religiusitas terhadap Pencegahan Fraud. Prosiding Akuntansi, 804-809.

Asosiasi Asuransi Umum Indonesia (AAUI). (2024). Pendapatan premi asuransi berdasarkan jalur distribusi terbesar dari broker. Kontan, Retrieved October 30, 2024, from https://keuangan.kontan.co.id/news/aaui-pendapatan-premi-asuransi-berdasarkan-jalur-distribusi-terbesar-dari-broker.

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). (2020). The fraud triangle. avalaible at : www.acfe.com/fraud-triangle.aspx. Retrieved from https://www.acfe.com/rttn/docs/2014-report-to-nations.pdf

Azizah, S., & Reskino, R. (2023). Pendeteksian Fraudulent Financial Statement: Pengujian Fraud Heptagon Theory. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Governance., 4(1), 17–37.

Coast. (2017). Qualitative Methods for Health Economics. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.

Cohen, J., Ding, Y., Lesage, C., & Stolowy, H. (2012). Corporate Fraud and Managers’ Behavior: Evidence from the Press. Entrepreneurship, Governance and Ethics. Springer.

Cressey, D. R. (1973). Other People's Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. American Journal of Sociology.

Crowe, H. (2011). Why the fraud triangle is no longer enough. Horwath, Crowe LLP.

de Nichilo, S., & Prahara, R. (2022). Paris Terrorism Attacks: Interdisciplinary Studies of Insider Trading and Money Laundering on Global Scale. Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 5(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.31538/iijse.v5i1.1785

Devi, P. N., Widanaputra, A. A., Budiasih, I. G., & Rasmini, N. K. (2021). The effect of fraud Pentagon theory on financial statements: Empirical evidence from Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(3), 1163-1169.

Domino, M. A., Wingreen, S. C., & Blanton, J. (2015). Social Cognitive Theory: The Antecedents and Effects of Ethical Climate Fit on Organizational Attitudes of Corporate Accounting Professionals—A Reflection of Client Narcissism and Fraud Attitude Risk. Journal of Busiin Distinguishing Errors from Fraud, 35(4), 57-78.

Ferwerda J, & P, R. (2019). Learning from money laundering National Risk Assessments: the case of Italy and Switzerland . European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 25: 5 - 20.

Financial Crime Academy. (n.d.). AML risk assessment in insurance. Retrieved October 30, 2024, from https://financialcrimeacademy.org/aml-risk-assessment-in-insurance/.

Gandhi, H., Tandon, K., Gite, S., Pradhan, B., & Alamri, A. (2024). Navigating the Complexity of Money Laundering: Anti–money Laundering Advancements with AI/ML Insights. International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems, 17(1).

Gill, M., & Goldstraw-White, J. (2015). Theft and Fraud by employees. Cullompton: Willian Publishing.

Glock, C. Y., & Stark, R. (1965). Religion and society in Tension. Chicago: Rand McNally.

Hartanto, D. (2012). Bimbingan & Konseling Menyontek: Mengungkap Akar Masalah dan Solusinya. Jakarta: Penerbit Indeks.

Hayati, N., & Amalia, I. (2021). The effect of religiosity and moderation of morality on fraud prevention in the management of village funds. The Indonesian Accounting Review, 11(1), 105-114.

Horwath, C. (2011). Putting the freud in fraud: Why the fraud triangle is no longer enough. IN Horwath: Crowe.

Kartikasari, M. D., & Fitriani, R. N. (2021). Detection of fraudulent financial reporting trough the Crowe' s Fraud Pentagon Theory in primary consumer goods indexed. Jurnal Ekonomi Modernisasi, 17(2), 125-138.

Kelly, P., & Hartley, C. (2010). Casino gambling and workplace fraud: a cautionary tale for managers. Management Research Review, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 224-239.

Kong, D., Xiang, J., Zhang, J., & Lu, Y. (2019). Politically Connected Independent Directors and Corporate Fraud in China. Accounting and Finance, 58(5), 1347-1383.

Kranacher, M., Riley, R., & Wells, J. (2010). Forensic Accounting and Fraud Examination. John Wiley and Sons.

Kuzmenko O V, V, L. S., & O, B. A. (2020). Data mining and bifurcation analysis of the risk of money laundering with the involvement of financial institutions .

Lambsdorff, J. (1999). Corruption in Empirical Research: A Review. Transparency International.

Levi, M., & Soudijn, M. (2020). Understanding the laundering of organized crime money. Crime Justice, 49: 579–631.

Mansor, N., & Abdullahi, R. (2015). Fraud triangle theory and fraud diamond theory. Understanding the convergent and divergent for future research. . International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Science, 1(4), 38-45.

Nguyen, K. (2010). Financial Statement Fraud: Motives, Methods, Cases and Detection. Universal Publisher.

Nurkhin, A., & Fachrurrozie, F. (2018). Analisis pengaruh dimensi fraud diamond terhadap perilaku kecurangan akademik mahasiswa pendidikan akuntansi UNNES. Liabilities (Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi), 1(1), 1-12.

Ofoeda I, Agbloyor E K, Abor J Y, & al, e. (2022). Anti‐money laundering regulations and financial sector development. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 27 (4): 4085 - 4104.

Purnamasari, P., & Amaliah, I. (2015). Fraud Prevention: Relevance to Religiosity and Spirituality in the Workplace. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 827–835. .

Ramada, D. P. (2022). Prevention of Money Laundering: Various Models, Problems and Challenges. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 3(1), 67-84.

Reskino. (2022). Fraud prevention mechanism and their influence on performance of Islamic financial institutions . Universiti Teknologi MARA.

Rezaee, Z., & Wang, J. (2019). Relevance of Big Data to Forensic Accounting Practice and Education. Managerial Auditing Journal, 34(3), 268-288.

Ribeiro, R., Silva, B., Pimenta, C., & Poeschl, G. (2020). Why Do Consumers Perpetrate Fraudulent Behaviors in Insurance? Crime, Law and Social Change, 73(3), 249-273.

Safitri, D. (2017). Pengaruh Religiusitas dan Komitmen Profesional terhadap Upaya Pencegahan Fraud di Pemerintahan. (Doctoral dissertation, UNIVERSITAS ARILANGGA).

Saputra, K. A., Mu'ah, M. J., J., K. C., & Manurung, D. T. (2022). Fraud Prevention Determinants: A Balinese Cultural Overview. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 16(3), 167-181.

Sauser, W. J. (2007). Employee theft: who, how, why, and what can be done. SAM Advanced Management Journal, Vol. 72 No. 3, p. 13.

Siddiq, Rahman, F., Achyani, F., & Zulfikar, Z. (2017). Fraud Pentagon dalam Mendeteksi Financial Statement Fraud. National Seminar and The 4th Call for Syariah Paper.

Suh, J. B., & Shim, H. S. (2020). The effect of ethical corporate culture on anti-fraud strategies in South Korean financial companies: Mediation of whistleblowing and a sectoral comparison approach in depository institutions. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 60, 100361.

Tobing, A. N. (2018). Consumer Protection Regulations in Life Insurance industry and its challenges: An empirical analysis from Indonesia. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7 (4.9): 241 - 246.

Veen, H., Heuts, L. F., & Leertouwer, E. C. (2020). Dutch national risk assessment on money laundering 2019.

Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: Considering the four elements of fraud. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42.

Yusof, M. K. (2016). Fraudulent Financial Reporting: An Application of Fraud Models to Malaysian Public Listed Companies. Hull, UK: Doctoral Dissertation, University of Hull.

Published
2025-04-18
How to Cite
Bagaskara, F., & Yanti, H. (2025). Examining Money Laundering in the Insurance Industry Through Fraud Heptagon Theory Perspective. Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 8(2), 4703-4723. https://doi.org/10.31538/iijse.v8i2.6186