Designing Key Risk Indicator Threshold and Risk Mitigation Strategies

  • Lina Apriliana Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
  • Vera Diyanty Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
Keywords: Risk Management, Key Risk Indicator, Key Performance Indicator, Financing Company

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to design a Key Risk Indicator (KRI) for the significant risks that have the potential to hinder the achievement of the company's targets, as well as to analyze the implementation of Law No. 4 of 2023, Article 252, regarding human resource development. The research is a case study of PT XYZ, which operates in the financing sector. The method used in this study is qualitative, with data collection through interviews and company document reviews. The KRI design is carried out by reviewing company documents, such as the risk register, to identify significant risks related to potential failures in achieving the company's targets, as reflected in the Key Performance Indicators. Then, the intermediate causes, root risks, KRI indicators, and threshold limits for these significant risks are determined. The significant risks identified include granting loans to debtors without considering their SLIK (Indonesian Credit Information System) history and delinquency, as well as analyzing the debtor's/candidate debtor's capacity without aligning with the actual conditions. The design of the KRI is expected to assist the company in monitoring events that indicate the occurrence of risks and enable early mitigation of risks that could affect performance achievement. Meanwhile, the risk mitigation design focuses on human resource development in accordance with Law No. 4 of 2023, Article 252. The risk mitigation design includes: 1) developing human resources through a refresher program by setting competency standards, 2) building a learning culture within the company, and 3) rotating Relationship Manager employees to the Collection department and removing them from Marketing activities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anggraeni, D., & Pratomo,B.W.(2023). Dampak undang-undang nomor 4 tahun 2023 tentang pengembangan dan penguatan sektor keuangan (P2SK) terhadap kelangsungan sektor jasa keuangan khususnya sektor lembaga pembiayaan, 5 (12). https://doi.org/10.32670/fairvalue.v5i11

Beasley, M., Branson, B., and Hancock, B. (2010). Developing Key Risk Indicators to Strengthen Enterprise Risk Management. Committee of Sponsoring Organization of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

Chigudu,D.,Don, A.K.P.,Kwong, J.K.Y. (2019). An explanatory study of Organizational Learning Culture and Its Impact on Employee Performance: Case Study of a Private Bank in Singapore. 7 (9). Page 163 -174. 10.24940/theijbm/2019/v7/i9/BM1909-059

Committee of Sponsoring Organization of the Treadway Commission. (2017). Enterprise Risk Management – Integrating with Strategy and Peformance.

Hunziker, S. (2021). Enterprise Risk Management. Spring Nature.

International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 31000: 2018-Risk Management: Principles and Guidance.

Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan. (2019). Keputusan Menteri Ketenagakerjaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 87 tahun 2019 tentang Penetapan standar kompetensi kerja nasional Indonesia kategori aktivitas keuangan dan asuransi golongan pokok aktivitas jasa keuangan, bukan asuransi dan dana pensiun bidang pembiayaan.

Lam, J. (2017). Implementing Enterprise Risk Management. John Wiley & Sons.

Muda, P. (2017). Analisis dan Perancangan Key Risk Indicators pada Proses Manajemen Risiko Perusahaan Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit (Studi Kasus Pada PT ABC). Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis. Universitas Indonesia.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). High Level Principles on Financial Consumer Protection.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2014). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (POJK) Nomor 29.POJK.05/2014 tentang Penyelenggaraan Usaha Perusahaan Pembiayaan.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2020). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (POJK) Nomor 44.POJK.05/2020 tentang Penerapan Manajemen Risiko bagi Lembaga Jasa Keuangan Non-bank.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2021). Surat Edaran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (SEOJK) Nomor 7 tahun 2021 tentang Penerapan Manajemen Risiko bagi Perusahaan Pembiayaan dan Perusahaan Pembiayaan Syariah.

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2022). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (POJK) Nomor 6.POJK.07/2022 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen dan Masyarakat di Sektor Jasa Keuangan.

PT XYZ (2023) Laporan Tahunan Perusahaan

PT XYZ (2023) Risk Register Perusahaan

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 4 tahun 2023 Tentang Pengembangan dan Penguatan Sektor Keuangan.

The World Bank Group. (2017). Good Practices for Financial Consumer Protections.

The World Bank Group. (2022). Developing a Risk-Based Approach to Financial Consumer Protection Supervision.

Todarita,T.,E, Halmaghi,E.,E. (2023). Creating a learning culture in the organisation. Scientific Bulletin. 28 (2). Page 210 – 214. DOI: 10.2478/bsaft-2023-0021

Wahyudiono (2015). Pengaruh Kompetensi Profesional dan Motovasi Kerja terhadap Kinerja Analis Kredit Mikro pada Lembaga Kredit Mikro Perbankan maupun Lembaga Keuangan Mikro, 1 (2). 10.34203/jimfe.vli2.559

Published
2026-01-19
How to Cite
Apriliana, L., & Diyanty, V. (2026). Designing Key Risk Indicator Threshold and Risk Mitigation Strategies. Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 8(3), 15018-15029. https://doi.org/10.31538/iijse.v8i3.6380