Enhancing Donation-Based Crowdfunding with Togaf & AI: Sustainability Case Study at Foundation XYZ
Abstract
Crowdfunding has emerged as a crucial mechanism for expanding financial accessibility, particularly for projects focused on sustainability. However, the success of foundation-based crowdfunding largely depends on trust and transparency. This study aims to investigate the role of these factors in influencing donor confidence and campaign success. Utilizing a mixed-method approach, the research combines qualitative and quantitative data analysis. The study was conducted on active crowdfunding campaigns within sustainability-focused foundations, employing surveys, interviews, and platform data analytics to assess stakeholder engagement, financial transparency, and campaign effectiveness. The findings reveal that transparent fund management significantly impacts donor trust, with campaigns demonstrating clear financial accountability attracting more sustained contributions. Additionally, the study identifies the importance of effective communication and measurable impact reporting in fostering a supportive crowdfunding ecosystem. The research provides actionable recommendations for foundation-based giving organizations and sustainable entrepreneurs to strengthen transparency and stakeholder involvement, ultimately enhancing donor confidence and community support for sustainability initiatives.
Downloads
References
Aggarwal, R., Lee, M. J., Osting, B., & Singh, H. (2021). Improving Funding Operations of Equity-based Crowdfunding Platforms. Production and Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13505
Andry, J. F., Sugian, D., Kartin, M., & Pranamya, D. (2022). Enterprise Architecture Design Using The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) at Logistic Courier Services. IT Journal Research and Development, 7(2), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.25299/itjrd.2023.8464
Behl, A., Dutta, P., Luo, Z., & Sheorey, P. (2022). Enabling artificial intelligence on a donation-based crowdfunding platform: a theoretical approach. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03906-z
Behl, A., Dutta, P., Sheorey, P., & Singh, R. K. (2023). Examining the role of dialogic communication and trust in donation-based crowdfunding tasks using information quality perspective. TQM Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-06-2020-0139
Camatti, J. A., Rabelo, G. M., Borsato, M., & Pellicciari, M. (2020). Comparative study of open IoT architectures with TOGAF for industry implementation. Procedia Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.159
Chen, S., Wang, H., Fang, Y., & Wang, W. (2023). Informational and emotional appeals of cover image in crowdfunding platforms and the moderating role of campaign outputs. Decision Support Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2023.113975
Creswell, J. (2017). Research Design; Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed. In Methods Approaches (Thousand O). CA: SAGE Publications.
Crosley, N., Indrajit, R. E., & Dazki, E. (2023). TOGAF Framework For an AI-enabled Software House. SinkrOn, 7(2), 1140–1152. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v8i2.12390
Eskaluspita, A. Y., & Sumitra, I. D. (2020). The Open Group Architecture Framework for Designing the Enterprise Architecture of ALIT. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 879(3), 012083. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/879/1/012083
Gai, L., Algeri, C., & Ielasi, F. (2025). Sustainability-Oriented Equity Crowdfunding : The Role of Proponents , Investors , and Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 17(21), 1–25.
Hariwibowo, I. N., Wulandari, C. E., & Setyohadi, D. B. (2022). Agency Relation in Online Charity Crowdfunding: The Role of Transparency to Attract Donation. IBIMA Business Review. https://doi.org/10.5171/2022.506046
Kubo, T., Veríssimo, D., Uryu, S., Mieno, T., & MacMillan, D. (2021). What determines the success and failure of environmental crowdfunding? Ambio, 50(9), 1659–1669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01522-0
Malik, A. N. A., & Annuar, S. N. S. (2021). The Effect of Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, Reward, and Perceived Risk toward E-Wallet Usage Intention. In Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65147-3_8
McDonough, A., & Rodríguez, D. C. (2020). How donors support civil society as government accountability advocates: a review of strategies and implications for transition of donor funding in global health. In Globalization and Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00628-6
Moysidou, K., & Hausberg, J. P. (2020). In crowdfunding we trust: A trust-building model in lending crowdfunding. Journal of Small Business Management, 58(3), 511–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2019.1661682
Nguyen, L. T. Q., Hoang, T. G., Do, L. H., Ngo, X. T., Nguyen, P. H. T., Nguyen, G. D. L., & Nguyen, G. N. T. (2021). The role of blockchain technology-based social crowdfunding in advancing social value creation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170(2), 120898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120898
Prędkiewicz, K., & Kalinowska-Beszczyńska, O. (2021). Financing eco-projects: analysis of factors influencing the success of crowdfunding campaigns. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 27(2), 547–566. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-05-2020-0339
Pushpakumara, Jayaweera, & Wanniarachchige. (2021). Using the Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) for Quality Assurance in Higher Education Teaching and Learning. In Proceedings of the 7th International Research Conference on Humanities & Social Sciences (IRCHSS). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3808691
Rejeb, A., Rejeb, K., Appolloni, A., & Treiblmaier, H. (2023). Navigating the crowdfunding landscape: a study of knowledge trajectories based on main path analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(7), 415–448. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-03-2023-0201
Salido-Andres, N., Rey-Garcia, M., Alvarez-Gonzalez, L. I., & Vazquez-Casielles, R. (2021). Mapping the Field of Donation-Based Crowdfunding for Charitable Causes: Systematic Review and Conceptual Framework. Voluntas, 32(5), 288–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00213-w
Santosa, I., & Mulyana, R. (2023). The IT Services Management Architecture Design for Large and Medium-sized Companies based on ITIL 4 and TOGAF Framework. International Journal on Informatics Visualization, 7(1), 30–42. https://doi.org/10.30630/joiv.7.1.1590
Sirisawat, S., Chatjuthamard, P., Kiattisin, S., & Treepongkaruna, S. (2022). The future of digital donation crowdfunding. PLoS ONE, 17(11), e0275898. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275898
Sugiyono. (2020). Metode Penelitian , Kuntitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D (2nd ed.). Alfabeta.
Troise, C., Battisti, E., Christofi, M., van Vulpen, N. J., & Tarba, S. (2023). How Can SMEs Use Crowdfunding Platforms to Internationalize? The Role of Equity and Reward Crowdfunding. Management International Review, 63(1), 117–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-022-00493-y
Utomo, D., Suzanna, & Wijaya, M. (2020). Tailoring TOGAF architectural development method to cloud adoption strategy. Proceedings of 2020 International Conference on Information Management and Technology, ICIMTech 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTech50083.2020.9211164
van Teunenbroek, C., Dalla Chiesa, C., & Hesse, L. (2023). The contribution of crowdfunding for philanthropy: A systematic review and framework of donation and reward crowdfunding. Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1791
Wehnert, P., & Beckmann, M. (2023). Crowdfunding for a Sustainable Future: A Systematic Literature Review. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(9), 3100–3115. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3066305
Yáñez-Valdés, C., & Guerrero, M. (2023). Equity crowdfunding platforms and sustainable impacts: encountering investors and technological initiatives for tackling social and environmental challenges. European Journal of Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-03-2022-0127
Zhang, Y., Tan, C. D., Sun, J., & Yang, Z. (2020). Why do people patronize donation-based crowdfunding platforms? An activity perspective of critical success factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(22), 106470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106470
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Teguh Prasetyo, Erick Dazki
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
