Notary’s Obligations to Prevent Suspicious Financial Transactions in Money Laundering Crimes
Abstract
Notaries dom’t have guidelines and guidance to prevent the occurrence of money laundering crimes that are faced with various types and characteristics of their opponents. The ambiguity of the norms in Article 16 paragraph (1) letter a of the Notary Law should be able to state the obligations of Notaries in carrying out their duties, must act in a trustworthy, honest, fair, independent, impartial manner and protect the interests of the parties involved in legal acts. This type of research is normative juridical using 3 (three) types of approaches, namely the statutory approach, the conceptual approach and the comparative approach. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that Notaries are required to apply the Principle of Recognizing Service Users (PMPJ) as part of implementing the principle of prudence, at least including identification of Service Users, verification of Service Users and monitoring of Service User transactions. This application applies to Notaries in providing services when preparing and conducting transactions for the benefit of or for and on behalf of Service Users, regarding the purchase and sale of property, management of money, securities, and/or other financial service products, management of checking accounts, savings accounts, deposit accounts, and/or securities accounts, operation and management of companies and/or establishment, purchase, sale of legal entities. Notaries can implement applications such as Data Banks for their parties who will create PPJB Deeds and Powers of Attorney for Sale and Purchase that are in accordance with KTP and KK, so as to minimize the occurrence of money laundering. Especially related to land, the land ownership limit must not exceed 20 hectares + 5 hectares.
Downloads
References
Adjie, H. (2009), Sanksi Perdata dan Administratif Terhadap Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Publik, Refika Aditama.
Adjie, H., (2014), “Apakah Tepat Notaris/PPAT Dikualifikasikan Sebagai Gatekeeper Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang” Makalah.
Afdhali, D.R. dan Taufiqurrohman Syahuri, (2023), “Idealitas Penegakkan Hukum Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Teori Tujuan Hukum”, Collegium Studiosorum Journal, 6(2): 550-565.
Amrullah, M.A., (2015), “Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Melalui Jasa Gatekeeper di Indonesia”, Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 6(1).
Amrullah, M.A., (2024), Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dalam Perspektif Kejahatan Terorganisasi: Pemberantasan dan Pencegahannya, Kencana.
Andhika, A.R., (2016), “Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Dalam Perkara Pidana Berkaitan Dengan Akta Yang Dibuatnya Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004”, Premise Law Journal, 2(6).
Anshori, A.G., (2009), Lembaga Kenotariatan Indonesia Perspektif Hukum dan Etika, UII Press.
Dewi, M. M. Y., & Permana, B. I. (2022). Keabsahan Akta Yang Dibuat Oleh Calon Notaris Yang Sedang Magang Di Kantor Notaris. Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan, 3(2), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v3i2.36437
Ganarsih, Y, (2019), Penegakan Hukum Anti Pencucian Uang dan Permasalahannya di Indonesia, Bina Ilmu.
Hadi, M. I. S., & Permana, B. I. (2022). Kontruksi Hukum Pembebasan Pajak Penghasilan Terhadap Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Dalam Pembagian Hak Bersama Waris. Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v3i1.34912
https//www.ojk.go.id/apu-id/berita-dan-kegiatan/publikasi/FATF-Recommendation-Update-June-2019.aspx
https://ppid.ppatk.go.id, diakses tanggal 15 Januari 2025.
https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/ diakses pada tanggal 11 Februari 2025.
https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/a26e30d33418156c3c928b1462e7be9e.html diakses pada tanggal 11 Februari 2025.
Lubis, A.U.P, (2020), “Analisis Yuridis Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Terhadap Pemalsuan Tanda Tangan Oleh Penghadap Dalam Akta Autentik”, Jurnal Somasi, 1(1).
Malela, M., (2019) “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris Yang Telah Diberhentikan Berdasarkan Pasal 13 Undang Undang Jabatan Notaris”, Jurnal Sapientia et Virtus, 4(2): 103 – 120.
Marzuki, P.M., (2016), Penelitian Hukum, Kencana.
Pengurus Pusat Ikatan Notaris Indonesia, (2008), Jati Diri Notaris Indonesia, Gramedia Pustaka.
Permana, B. I., Al Farizy, M. R., & Manggala, F. P. (2024). Responsibility of Notary for Registered Private Deed in the Perspective of Law of Evidence. Jurnal Justiciabelen, 7(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.30587/justibelen.v7i1.7801
Permana, B. I., Prakoso, B., & Hariyani, I. (2022). Legal Certainty of Income Tax Exemption on the Transfer of Rights to Land in the Sharing of Collective Integration Rights. International Journal Of Social Science And Education Research Studies, 2(11), 603–610. https://doi.org/10.55677/IJSSERS/V02I11Y2022-02
Rahayu, L. S., et.al, (2021), “Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (Money Laundering) Sebagai Transnational Crime Di Era Globalisasi Dengan Perbandingan Peraturan Perundang Undangan Di Indonesia, Singapura, Dan Philipina”, Jurnal Hukum Positum, 6(1).
Rahma, H.F., 2018, Tanggung Jawab Dan Akibat Hukum Notaris Dalam Melakukan Identifikasi Dan Verifikasi Data Pengguna Jasa Dalam Peraturan Menteri Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Nomor 9 Tahun 2017, Tesis Program Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Islam Indonesia Yogyakarta.
Rasjidi, L. dan I.B. Wyasa Putra, (1993), Hukum Sebagai Suatu Sistem, Remaja Rosdakarya.
Rivardy, R. dan Rexy Runtuwene, (2017), “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Sebagai Suatu Perkembangan Tindak Pidana”, Jurnal Lex Et Societatis, 5(2).
Rosdiana, A.C., “Perlindungan Hukum Notaris Sebagai Pihak Pelapor Dalam Transaksi Keuangan Mencurigakan Pada Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang”, Jurnal Jatiswara, 37(1).
Siska, E. dan Supriyadi, (2022), “Peran Notaris Dalam Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang di Era Digital Melalui Aplikasi Go Anti Money Laundering (GoAML)”, Jurnal Hukum TORA, 8(3).
Subari, M. I., & Kurniawan, J. F. (2023). Penggunaan Klausula Proteksi Diri Bagi Notaris Dalam Akta Partij ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan, 4(2), 144–160. https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v4i2.44196
The FATF Recommendations, (2023), International Standards on Combating Money Laundering and The Financing of Terrorism & Proliferation.
Tubagus, I., (2006), Hukum Pembuktian Pencucian Uang: Money Laundering, MQS Publishing.
UNODC, (2005), Model Legislation on Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism.
Wahyuningrum, P. (2017), “Kewajiban Notaris Menyampaikan Laporan Transaksi Keuangan Mencurigakan Kepada Pusat Pelaporan dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang”, Jurnal Repertorium, 6(2).
Yustiavandana, I. Arman Nefi dan Adiwarman, (2010), Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang di Pasar Modal, Ghalia Indonesia.
Copyright (c) 2025 Dhia Savira Fadhilla, Mohammad Arief Amrullah, Ainul Azizah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
