Moderating Task Complexity in the Influence of Locus of Control, Self-Efficacy, and Time Budget Pressure on Audit Judgment: A Bibliometric Analysis
Abstract
Auditors play a crucial role in ensuring that the financial statements presented by audited entities are prepared fairly and accurately. In the auditing environment, where the application of audit judgment is critical, its significance becomes even more pronounced under conditions of high uncertainty and limited time. This study focuses on the factors influencing auditors’ audit judgment, particularly locus of control, self-efficacy, and time budget pressure. Audit judgment is essential when auditors are confronted with task complexity and incomplete information, requiring them to exercise professional discretion in evaluating and determining audit outcomes. This research adopts a bibliometric literature review method, wherein relevant scientific articles published in the Scopus database between 2015 and 2025 were systematically collected, screened, and analyzed using VOSviewer software. Through this bibliometric approach, the study identifies publication trends, dominant keywords, co-authorship patterns, and thematic clusters related to the factors affecting audit judgment. The review highlights key variables such as locus of control—which pertains to auditors' perceived control over their professional responsibilities; self-efficacy—which reflects their belief in their ability to carry out audit tasks effectively; and time budget pressure—which represents the constraints imposed by limited time during audit engagements. Additionally, the findings indicate that task complexity serves as a moderating variable that may amplify or diminish the effects of these factors on the quality of audit judgment.
Downloads
References
Abdillah, T. R., Setyadi, E. J., Santoso, S. B., & Mudjiyanti, R. (2020). Pengaruh Tekanan Anggaran Waktu, Tekanan Ketaatan, dan Pengalaman Auditor Terhadap Audit Judgment (Studi Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta). Ratio : Reviu Akuntansi Kontemporer Indonesia, 1(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.30595/ratio.v1i1.7972
Andryani, H., Piturungsih, E., & Furkan, L. M. (2019). Pengaruh Tekanan Ketaatan, Keahlian Audit Dan Pengalaman Audit Terhadap Audit Judgment Dengan Kompleksitas Tugas Sebagai Pemoderasi. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Aksioma, 18(2), 79–115.
Dewi, N. P. S., Muliartini, N. K. K., & Rustiarini, N. W. (2021). Audit Judgment with Emotional Intelligence as Moderation Variable in BPKP Bali. AFEBI Accounting Review, 6(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.47312/aar.v6i01.412
Gundry, L. C., & Liyanarachchi, G. A. (2007). Time budget pressure, auditors’ personality type, and the incidence of reduced audit quality practices. Pacific Accounting Review, 19(2), 125–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/01140580710819898
Heider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Herlambang, E. A., Apriyanto, G., & Harmono. (2023). Determinants of Auditor’s Judgement: Empirical Evident from Indonesia. Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Studies, 06(09), 4347–4358. https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v6-i9-23
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817410.023
Karimullah, S. A., & Yuyetta, E. (2021). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Audit Judgement Dengan Task Complexity Sebagai Pemoderasi (Studi Kasus pada Auditor Kantor Akuntan Publik di Kota Semarang). Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 10(4), 1–13.
Lee, H. (2012). Incentive contracts and time pressure on audit judgment performance. Managerial Auditing Journal, 27(3), 263–283. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686901211207492
Manurung, L. A. R., & Hasbi, M. (2023). The Effect of Gender Differences, Locus of Control, and Seniority Auditor on Audit Judgment: Empirical Studies in East Jakarta Public Accounting Firms. Research of Accounting and Governance, 1(2), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.58777/rag.v1i2.48
Nasution, D., & Östermark, R. (2012). The impact of social pressures, locus of control, and professional commitment on auditors’ judgment: Indonesian evidence. Asian Review of Accounting, 20(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/13217341211242204
Nirmala, M. R. V., & Latrini, M. Y. (2017). Pengaruh Keahlian, Tekanan Ketaatan, Tekanan Waktu Terhadap Kualitas Audit Judgment Dengan Kompleksitas Tugas Sebagai Pemoderasi. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 19(1), 683–711. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1kgdff6.17
Rachman, Dr. M. M. (2022). Locus Of Control Sebagai Pengendali Individu Karyawan Terhadap Kesuksesan (M. Dewi, Ed.). Cipta Media Nusantara (CMN).
Sari, D. I., & Ruhiyat, E. (2017). Pengaruh Locus of Control, Tekanan Ketaatan Dan Kompleksitas Tugas Terhadap Audit Judgment. Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset), 9(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.17509/jaset.v9i2.9230
Septiaji, B. C., & Hasymi, M. (2021). Gender Self Efficacy Tekanan Ketaatan Kompleksitas Tugas Dan Pengalaman Auditor Terhadap Audit Judgement. Balance : Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 6(1), 55–68.
Tumurang, D. O., Ilat, V., & Y.B Kalalo, M. (2019). Pengaruh Self Efficacy, Kompleksitas Tugas Dan Keahlian Audit Terhadap Audit Judgment Auditor Pada Inspektorat Provinsi Sulawesi Utara. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 7(3), 3919–3928.
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2018). VOSviwer Manual version 1.6.10. Universiteit Leiden, January.
Virlianda, O., & Jaeni. (2022). Peran Kompleksitas Tugas Sebagai Pemoderasi Dalam Menentukan Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Audit Judgment. Kompak :Jurnal Ilmiah Komputerisasi Akuntansi, 15(2), 391–402. https://doi.org/10.51903/kompak.v15i2.806
Wijaksana, N. M. P. L., & Dewi, L. G. K. (2019). Kecerdasan Emosional Memoderasi Pengaruh Tekanan Anggaran waktu dan Tekanan Ketaatan Pada Auditor Judgement BPK Pusat. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 28(3), 1698–1714.
Copyright (c) 2025 Erlangga Prakasa, Poppy Sofia Koeswayo, Ahmad Zakie Mubarrok

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.















