The Relationship Between Fraud Pentagon, Audit Quality, and Financial Performance with the Risk of Financial Statement Fraud: An Empirical Study on PT Indofarma

  • Carsinah Azhara University Swadaya Gunung Jati, Cirebon, Indonesia
  • Sirri Mubarokah Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati Cirebon, Indonesia
  • Cahya Dewi Kirani Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati Cirebon, Indonesia
  • Janiman Janiman Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati Cirebon, Indonesia
Keywords: Fraud Pentagon, Audit Quality, Financial Performance, Beneish M-Score, Financial Statement Manipulation

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of Fraud Pentagon, Audit Quality, and Financial Performance on the risk of financial statement fraud at PT Indofarma Tbk during the period 2020-2023. The method used is a quantitative approach with a linear regression model, as well as fraud detection through the Beneish M-Score and evaluation of risk factors using the Fraud Pentagon Model. The results showed that the Beneish M-Score value was consistently above the -2.22 threshold, indicating the potential for earnings manipulation throughout the observation period, with the highest peak in 2022. In addition, the Fraud Pentagon Score increased significantly in 2023, mainly influenced by the pressure (1.00000) and competence (0.94069) factors, which are the main indicators of increased fraud risk. Although the regression test results show that the effect of the three variables is not statistically significant (p-value > 0.05), the Fraud Pentagon has the highest practical contribution (R² = 0.302) in explaining the variation of report manipulation. This finding confirms the importance of monitoring financial pressure and perpetrator competence in the early detection of fraud. This study recommends strengthening corporate governance, increasing auditor independence, and managing financial pressure as more effective fraud prevention strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amalia, R. (2024). Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Theory Dalam Mendeteksi Fraudulent Financial Reporting Pada Perusahaan Consumer Goods Yang …. 8, 4341–4352. http://repository.unissula.ac.id/id/eprint/33871%0Ahttp://repository.unissula.ac.id/33871/1/Akuntansi_31402200106_fullpdf.pdf

Andriani, K. F., Budiartha, K., Sari, M. M. R., & Widanaputra, A. A. G. P. (2022). Fraud pentagon elements in detecting fraudulent financial statement. Linguistics and Culture Review, 6, 686–710. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v6ns1.2145

Annafi, G. D., & Yudowati, S. P. (2021). Analisis Financial Distress, Profitabilitas dan Materialitas Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Kompetif, 4(3), 1–8.

Asmaranti, Y., Lokman, N., & Rahman, R. A. (2023). Detection of Financial Statement Fraud Using Fraud Pentagon Theory Perspective in Indonesia. Proceedings of the International Conference in Technology, Humanities and Management (ICTHM 2023), 12-13 June, 2023, Istanbul, Turkey, 131, 192–202. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2023.11.16

Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Lapides, P. D. (2000). Fraudulent financial reporting: Consideration of industry traits and corporate governance mechanisms. Accounting Horizons, 14(4), 441–454. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2000.14.4.441

Cressey’s. (1953). Detecting and Predicting Financial Statement Fraud : The Efectiveness Of The Fraud Triangle and SAS No.99. 99, 53–81. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1295494Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=1295494Electroniccopyavailableat:http://ssrn.com/abstract=1295494Electroniccopyavailableat:https://ssrn.com/abstract=1295494

DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1

Dewi, C. K., & Yuliati, A. (2022). Pengaruh Fraud Hexagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Makanan dan Minuman Yang Terdaftar di BEI). Jurnal Riset Terapan Akuntansi, 6(2), 115–128. https://jurnal.polsri.ac.id/index.php/jrtap/article/view/4645

Isbahi, M. B. (2023). Factors Influencing Purchase Behavior: Consumer Interest, Price, and Product Quality (Literature Review HRM). Danadyaksa: Post Modern Economy Journal, 1(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.69965/danadyaksa.v1i1.6

Ivandi, I., & Sitorus, T. (2019). Anteseden Variabel Kualitas Audit Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Jurnal Manajemen, 16(1), 42–63. https://doi.org/10.25170/jm.v16i1.790

Kadek, N., Tiapandewi, Y., Nyoman, N., Suryandari, A., Gede, A. A. P., & Arie, B. (2020). Dampak Fraud Triangle Dan Komite Audit Terhadap. Kumpulan Hasil …, 2(2), 156–173. https://e-journal.unmas.ac.id/index.php/kharisma/article/view/979%0Ahttps://e-journal.unmas.ac.id/index.php/kharisma/article/download/979/846

Khomariah, O. A., & Khomsiyah, K. (2023). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajerial, Kinerja Keuangan, dan Kualitas Audit terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Owner, 7(4), 3610–3620. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v7i4.1734

Lou, Y.-I., & Wang, M.-L. (2011). Fraud Risk Factor Of The Fraud Triangle Assessing The Likelihood Of Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 7(2), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.19030/jber.v7i2.2262

Luhri, A. S. R. N., Mashuri, A. A. S., & Ermaya, H. N. L. (2021). Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan dengan Komite Audit sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan, Dan Manajemen, 3(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.35912/jakman.v3i1.481

Marks, J. (2012). The Mind Behind the Fraudsters Crime: Key Behavioral and Environmental Elements. United States of America: Crowe Horwath LLP, 1–62. https://www.crowe.com/

Murphy, P. R., & Dacin, M. T. (2011). Psychological Pathways to Fraud: Understanding and Preventing Fraud in Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(4), 601–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0741-0

Novarina, D., & Triyanto, D. N. (2022). Pengaruh Fraud Hexagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan LQ 45 Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2016-2020. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 10(2), 183. https://doi.org/10.29103/jak.v10i2.7352

Sahla, W. A., & Ardianto, A. (2023). Ethical values and auditors fraud tendency perception: testing of fraud pentagon theory. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(4), 966–982. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-04-2022-0086

Salmahabi Alliandra Putri, Apriani, N., & Janiman. (2024). The Effect of Carbon Tax, Capital Expenditure and Firm Size on Carbon Emission Disclosure on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Indonesian Journal of Advanced Research, 3(7), 1005–1016. https://doi.org/10.55927/ijar.v3i7.10046

Toha, Mohamad & Supriyanto. (2023). Factors Influencing the Consumer Research Process: Market Target, Purchasing Behavior and Market Demand (Literature Review Of Consumer Behavior). Danadyaksa: Post Modern Economy Journal, 1(1), 1–17. Retrieved from https://e-journal.bustanul-ulum.id/in

Wang, J., & Wang, D. (2022). Corporate Fraud and Accounting Firm Involvement: Evidence from China. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15040180

Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The FWolfe, D. T. and Hermanson, D. R. (2004) ‘The Fraud Diamond : Considering the Four Elements of Fraud: Certified Public Accountant’, The CPA Journal, 74(12), pp. 38–42. doi: DOI:raud Diamond : Considering the Four ElemWolfe, D. T. and Hermanson, D. R. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42.

Yousefi Nejad, M., Sarwar Khan, A., & Othman, J. (2024). A panel data analysis of the effect of audit quality on financial statement fraud. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 9(4), 422–445. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-04-2023-0112

Published
2025-08-20
How to Cite
Azhara, C., Mubarokah, S., Kirani, C. D., & Janiman, J. (2025). The Relationship Between Fraud Pentagon, Audit Quality, and Financial Performance with the Risk of Financial Statement Fraud: An Empirical Study on PT Indofarma. Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 8(3), 9788-9800. https://doi.org/10.31538/iijse.v8i3.7206