Reformulation of the Approval of the Honorary Council of Notaries in Providing Recommendations for the Interests of the Court
Abstract
The Notary Honorary Council as a new organ that emerged in the Amendment to the UUJN has become a crucial organ in the law enforcement process for the benefit of the judiciary and its efforts to maintain the nobility and dignity of the Notary Office, this is because of the approval or rejection issued by the MKN at the request of investigators, public prosecutors or judges when they want to take a photocopy of the Minutes of the Deed and/or summon a Notary related to the Deed or Notary Protocol that is in the Notary's storage. This article provides an understanding of the actual characteristics of the MKN's authority and what the MKN's recommendation formulation is in order to maintain the honor of the Notary Office and uphold the judicial process. The results of the analysis found that the MKN's authority to provide approval or rejection of requests from investigators, public prosecutors, or judges for the benefit of the judiciary and the authority in terms of guiding as referred to in Article 66 and Article 66A of the Amendment to the UUJN is categorized as attributive authority based on several reasons: Authority granted by law; Authority that cannot be transferred; and Special purpose of authority. Meanwhile, the MKNW recommendation formulation for approval or rejection is in the form of a final and binding state administrative decision, and there are no Administrative Efforts. Clear procedures serve to realize legitimacy, transparency, and responsibility as well as the protection of the rights and interests of Notaries. The structure of the recommendation for approval or rejection made by the MKNW can at least include: the identity of the parties involved, the legal basis for the application, a description of the request, considerations and reasons for approval, limitations and provisions, the validity period of the approval, signatures, and official stamps.
Downloads
References
Adjie, Habib. Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Wilayah (MKNW) Sebagai Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara Dan Keputusannya Sebagai Keputasan Tata Usaha Negara. Malang: Literasi Nusantara Abadi, 2024.
Apita Maya, Evi. “Kedudukan dan Kewenangan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris dalam Pembinaan Terhadap Notaris”, Jurnal IUS 5, no. 2 (2017): 246-262. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v5i2.455
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Konpres, 2005.
Campbell Black, Henry. Black’s Law Dictionary. St Paul Minn: West Publishing, 1990.
Ghofur Anshori, Abdul. Lembaga Kenotariatan Indonesia Perspektif Hukum dan Etika. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2001.
H.D Stout. De Betekenissen van de Wet, Theoritisch-Kritische Beschouwingen over het Principe van Wetmatigheid van Bestuur. Zwolle: W.E.J Tjenk Willink, 1994.
Johan Nasution, Bahder. “Penerapan Sanksi Administratif Sebagai Sarana Pengendali Pembatasan Terhadap Kebebasan Bertindak Notaris”. Recital Review 2, no.1 (2020): 1-13.
Laica Marzuki, H.M., “Penggunaan Upaya Hukum Administrasi Dalam Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara”, Hukum dan Pembangunan, No. 2 (1992): 169-177. DOI:10.21143/jhp.vol22.no2.373
M. Hadjon, Philipus. Hukum Administrasi dan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Yogyakarta; Gadjah Mada University Press, 2012.
M. Hadjon, Philipus. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia (Studi tentang Prinsip- prinsipnya, Penangananya oleh Peradilan Umum dan Pembentukan Peradilan Administrasi Negara. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu, l997.
Mahanani, E. S., & Hariyani, I. (2023). The Urgency of The Indonesian Notary Association (INI) In Development And Supervision Of Notary. Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan, 4(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v4i1.38764
Muhaimin. “Penetapan Tersangka Tidak Ada Batas Waktu”, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 20, no. 2 (2020): 275-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.V20.275-288
Nugrahaningsih, I. V. (2023). The Role of Regional Honor Council In Maintaining The Honor of Notary Position. Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v4i1.38566
Nur Hari Susanto, Sri. “Metode Perolehan Dan Batas-Batas Wewenang Pemerintahan”, Administrative Law & Governance Journal 3, no. 3 (2020): 430-441. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v3i3.430-441
Philipus M. Hadjon. Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Indonesia. Yogyakarta; Gadjah Mada University Press, 2008.
Philipus M. Hadjon. Tentang Wewenang. Surabaya: Yuridika, 1997.
Ponce, Juli. “Good Administration and Administrative Procedures”. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 12, no. 2 (2005): 551-588.
Prabowo Gutho, Ilham. Patricia Audrey Ruslijanto, Diah Aju Wisnu Wardani, “Implikasi Hukum bagi Notaris yang Menghindari Panggilan Penyidik”. Jurnal USM Law Review 7, no. 2 (2024): 570-585. DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i2.8981
Prodjodikoro, R. Wirjono. Asas-Asas Hukum Perjanjian. Bandung: Mandar Maju, Cetakan VIII, 2000.
Ridwan HR., Hukum Administrasi Negara. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta; Rajawali Pers, 2011.
Ridwan HR., Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2002.
Salim H.S. Peraturan Jabatan Notaris. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2018.
Sjaifurrachman. Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2011.
Suwardi. Hukum Dagang Suatu Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2015.
Syahrani, Riduan. Rangkuman Intisari Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2004.
Copyright (c) 2025 Tri Wahyudiono, Ermanto Fahamsyah, Bhim Prakoso, Gatot Eddy Pramono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
