Village Officials’ Perceptions of the Potential for Fraud in Village Fund Management with Moral Reasoning as a Moderating Variable

  • Nanak Andrean Prayoga Universitas Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia
  • Saring Suhendro Universitas Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia
  • Liza Alvia Universitas Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia
Keywords: Collusion, Ego, Fraud Hexagon, Moral Reasoning, Village Fund Fraud

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the influence of collusion, ego, and fraud hexagon elements on the potential for fraud in village fund management, as well as the role of moral reasoning as a moderating variable. The results indicate that collusion and ego have a positive and significant effect on the potential for fraud, meaning that higher levels of collusion and ego among village officials increase the likelihood of fraud. Conversely, factors such as pressure, capability, opportunity, and rationalization do not have a significant impact on fraud potential. Further findings reveal that moral reasoning significantly weakens the influence of pressure, collusion, opportunity, rationalization, and ego on fraud potential. However, the capability element remains significant and cannot be moderated by moral reasoning. These results underscore the importance of strengthening moral reasoning through ethics and integrity training for village officials to reduce the potential for fraud in village fund management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ACFE. (2024). Occupational Fraud 2024 :A Report To The Nations. In Association of Certified Fraud Examiners.

Creswell, J. W., & Hirose, M. (2019). Mixed methods and survey research in family medicine and community health. Family Medicine and Community Health, 7(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2018-000086

Divisi Hukum dan Monitoring Peradilan ICW. (2024). Laporan Hasil Pemantauan Tren Korupsi Tahun 2023. www.antikorupsi.org

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). In SAGE Publications Inc. (Third Edit). CRC Press. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781032725581/chapters/10.1201/9781032725581-7

Ikhsan, A., & Ishak, M. (2005). Akuntansi Keperilakuan. Salemba Empat.

Jogiyanto. (2014). Pedoman Survei Kuesioner Mengembangkan Kuesioner, Mengatasi Bias dan Meningkatkan Respon (Book Ed.2). BPFE UGM.

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2015). Kajian Pengelolaan Keuangan Desa : Dana Desa dan Alokasinya. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/publikasi/kajian-dan-penelitian/penelitian/505-kajian-pengelolaan-keuangan-desa-dana-desa-dan-alokasinya

Ristianingsih, I. (2018). Telaah Konsep Fraud Diamond Theory Dalam Mendeteksi Perilaku Fraud DI Perguruan Tinggi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Dan Call For Paper Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 128–139. https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/prosiding/article/view/6731

Robbins, S. P. (2003). Perilaku Organisasi (Edisi kese). Gramedia.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2009). Perilaku Organisasi. Salemba Empat.

Sheard, J. (2018). Quantitative data analysis. In Research Methods: Information, Systems, and Contexts (pp. 429–452). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102220-7.00018-2

Velasquez, M. G. (2018). Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases (8th editio). Pearson.

Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing theory of fraud: The S.C.O.R.E. Model. Journal of Financial Crime, 136(4), 1–18.

Wikström, P.-O. H. (2019). Situational Action Theory: Toward a Dynamic Theory of Crime and Its Causes. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.456

Williams, T. A., & Shepherd, D. A. (2015). Mixed Method Social Network Analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 20(2), 268–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115610807

Published
2025-10-03
How to Cite
Prayoga, N., Suhendro, S., & Alvia, L. (2025). Village Officials’ Perceptions of the Potential for Fraud in Village Fund Management with Moral Reasoning as a Moderating Variable. Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 9(1), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.31538/iijse.v9i1.8165

Most read articles by the same author(s)