Legal Reasoning Behind the Abolition of the Right to File for Judicial Review of Administrative Court Decisions by Administrative Agencies or Officials

  • Haru Permadi Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia
  • Oppy Pramudya W. W. Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia
Keywords: Constitutional Judge, Judicial Review, Legal Reasoning

Abstract

The purpose of writing this article is to examine the legal reasoning for the elimination of the right to review the decision of a state administrative dispute by a state administrative body or official. The method used in writing this article is normative juridical. The study found that the Constitutional Court judges used a historical approach, a conceptual approach, and systematic interpretation in determining the abolition of the right of review in state administrative disputes by state administrative bodies or officials. In conclusion, the judges of the Constitutional Court abolished the right of judicial review to provide legal certainty over an inkracht decision of the State Administrative Court, protect public rights, and realize the original purpose of establishing the State Administrative Court.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali Abdullah (2021). Teori dan Praktik Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Pasca-Amandemen. Jakarta: Kencana.

Chitra Imelda, Pandapotan Damanik, dkk (2024). Hukum Acara di Indonesia. Padang: Gita Lentera.

Ecep Nurjamal (2023). Pengantar Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Tasikmalaya: Edu Publisher.

Farangga Harki Ardiansyah, Alfitra, dkk (2018). Upaya Hukum Peninjauan Kembali Dalam Perkara Perdata (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 118/PK/Pdt/2018). Jurnal of Legal Research.

Herri Swantoro (2017). Harmonisasi Keadilan & Kepastian dalam Peninjauan Kembali. Depok: Prenadamedia Group.

Nurul Qamar, Amiruddin, dkk (2018). Negara Hukum atau Negara Kekuasaan (Rechstaat or Machstaat). Makassar: Social Politic Genis (SIGn).

Pengajuan Upaya Hukum (ptun-banjarmasin.go.id). Diakses 21 Juli 2024.

Safa’at, M. A., Ekatjahjana, W., Fatmawati., Saifuddin., & Amsari, F. (2011). Hukum acara Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.

Thomas Tokan Pureklolon (2020). Negara Hukum dalam Pemikiran Politik. Yogyakarta: PT KANISIUS.

Direktorat Jenderal Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. (2023). Statistik Perkara dan Putusan PTUN Tahun 2022. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung RI.

Harahap, M. (2022). Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Potensi Kesalahan Material dalam Putusan Kasasi PTUN. Jurnal Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.

Haryono, A. (2023). Dampak Penghapusan Hak PK terhadap Akuntabilitas PTUN. Jurnal Hukum Administrasi Negara.

Kurniawan, A. (2022). Penyalahgunaan Upaya Hukum dalam Sistem Peradilan Administrasi. Bandung: Penerbit Nusantara.

Putra, D. (2024). Legal Reform in Administrative Disputes: Balancing Finality and Justice. Indonesian Journal of Legal Studies.

Satrio, J. (2021). Peran PK dalam Sistem Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Penerbit Universitas Indonesia.

Sihombing, E. (2022). Hak PK dan Keadilan Administratif. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum.

Siregar, B. (2021). Dilema Pembatasan PK: Kepastian Hukum vs Keadilan Substantif. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Universitas Indonesia.

Susanti, D. (2023). Reformasi Sistem Peninjauan Kembali dalam Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Penerbit Prenada.

Wahyuni, S. (2023). Efisiensi vs Keadilan: Analisis Kebijakan Penghapusan PK bagi Pemerintah. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia.

Wibowo, R. (2023). PK sebagai Ultimum Remedium dalam Sistem Peradilan Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi.

Published
2025-08-31
How to Cite
Permadi, H., & W. W., O. (2025). Legal Reasoning Behind the Abolition of the Right to File for Judicial Review of Administrative Court Decisions by Administrative Agencies or Officials. Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 8(3), 10279-10290. https://doi.org/10.31538/iijse.v8i3.8628