Designing a Real-Time TKDN Monitoring Dashboard Concept as a Decision Support System Aligned with Akhlak Values at PT Bukit Asam

Tania Citra Sarendra; Utomo Sarjono Putro

doi:10.31538/iijse.v8i3.8637

Tania Citra Sarendra Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia
Utomo Sarjono Putro Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31538/iijse.v8i3.8637

Keywords: TKDN, Dashboard, Decision Support System, User-Centered Design, AKHLAK, PTBA, Procurement

Abstract

The Domestic Component Level (Tingkat Komponen Dalam Negeri/TKDN) policy is a key instrument of the Indonesian government to strengthen national industries through procurement activities. For state-owned enterprises (SOEs) such as PT Bukit Asam Tbk (PTBA), TKDN implementation must also reflect AKHLAK values as ethical guidelines for governance. Although PTBA has consistently met TKDN targets, reporting remains manual, relying on Excel and a single person-in-charge. This condition creates inefficiencies, risks of data inconsistency, and limited responsiveness to urgent requests from regulators. This study addresses the problem of the absence of an integrated mechanism to monitor TKDN realization in real time within PTBA’s electronic procurement system (SPEND). The research objective is to design a TKDN monitoring dashboard conceptualized as a Decision Support System (DSS) that incorporates automation, user-centered design (UCD), and AKHLAK values. An exploratory qualitative method was employed, combining semi-structured interviews, participant observation, and document review. Data were analyzed using thematic coding, supported by SWOT analysis, to identify system gaps, user requirements, and ethical value integration. UCD principles were applied to ensure that dashboard features were aligned with stakeholder needs and validated through feedback from key informants. The findings confirm three main themes: limitations of the current reporting system, the need for an interactive dashboard, and the importance of embedding AKHLAK values in system design. A static mock-up was developed, featuring real-time visualization, dynamic filters, role-based access, and modules for certificate management and reporting. This study contributes theoretically by integrating DSS, UCD, knowledge management, and organizational values into dashboard design, and practically by providing PTBA with a blueprint for optimizing SPEND to support more efficient, transparent, and accountable procurement governance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adam, F., Csáki, C., & Vlahu-Gjorgievska, E. (2012). Decision support systems: Ethical and social issues. Journal of Decision Systems, 21(3), 223–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2012.689014

Aslam, T. (2022). Cross-functional collaboration in information systems: A framework for integration. International Journal of Information Systems Studies, 15(2), 88–101.

Cepero, J. M., López, M., & Pérez, R. (2025). Designing dashboards using a user-centered approach: Lessons from the Xalapa Dashboard case. Journal of Information Visualization, 29(1), 55–69.

Csáki, C., & Adam, F. (2010). Public procurement decision support: Legal and administrative perspectives. Public Administration Quarterly, 34(2), 145–166.

Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (2010). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know (2nd ed.). Harvard Business School Press.

Dewi, A. R., Nugraha, R., & Fitriani, S. (2024). Information system integration to support harmonized decision-making. Asian Journal of Information Systems, 12(1), 34–47.

Divany, D. (2024). User-sensitive dashboard design for power plant operations. Energy Systems and Management Review, 16(3), 201–215.

Gürel, E., & Tat, M. (2017). SWOT analysis: A theoretical review. Journal of International Social Research, 10(51), 994–1006.

Gunasegaran, K., Raman, S., & Ismail, Z. (2023). E-procurement challenges in developing economies: Risks of non-automated systems. Journal of Procurement and Supply Chain, 8(2), 102–115.

Hashim, N., Rahman, R. A., & Hamid, S. (2022). User experience dimensions in e-procurement adoption. Journal of Business Information Systems, 26(4), 451–467.

Kevin, R., Choi, J., & Lee, S. (2024). Datamart and dashboard integration for regulatory reporting: A user-centered approach. Journal of Data and Information Quality, 16(1), 1–17.

Lamothe, M., Sharmin, S., & Chowdhury, M. (2025). Ethical decision support in public procurement: Strengthening accountability and trust. Government Information Quarterly, 42(2), 112–125.

Lemar, J. (2018). E-procurement and transparency in public administration. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 31(4), 412–427.

Micolta Diaz, D. (2025). Knowledge management in public procurement entities: Toward efficiency and sustainability. Public Sector Management Review, 19(1), 75–92.

Myakala, R., Thomas, P., & Kumar, A. (2024). Effective dashboard design principles: Color, organization, and accessibility. Information Systems Frontiers, 26(2), 299–315.

Nickerson, C., & Geipel, T. (2019). Why local content policies fail: Lessons from global procurement practices. Energy Policy, 128, 460–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.01.033

Pakkala, H., Jokinen, T., & Salminen, A. (2024). Knowledge management systems for industrial assets: A procurement perspective. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(1), 22–40.

Panagiotou, G. (2003). Bringing SWOT into focus. Business Strategy Review, 14(2), 8–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8616.00253

PT Bukit Asam. (2024). Guidelines for the implementation of domestic product utilization. PT Bukit Asam Tbk.

Rahman, F., Aziz, S., & Lestari, I. (2025). Embedding UCD principles in interactive dashboards: A managerial perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 41(1), 115–136.

Republik Indonesia. (2011). Peraturan Menteri Perindustrian No. 16/M-IND/PER/2/2011 tentang Ketentuan dan Tata Cara Perhitungan Tingkat Komponen Dalam Negeri (TKDN). Ministry of Industry.

Republik Indonesia. (2020). Surat Edaran Menteri BUMN No. SE-7/MBU/07/2020 tentang Nilai-Nilai Utama Sumber Daya Manusia BUMN (AKHLAK). Ministry of State-Owned Enterprises.

Republik Indonesia. (2022). Instruksi Presiden No. 2 Tahun 2022 tentang Percepatan Peningkatan Penggunaan Produk Dalam Negeri.

Sharmin, S., & Chowdhury, M. (2025). Embedding ethics into DSS: Evidence from e-governance systems. Journal of Public Sector Information Systems, 33(1), 88–103.

Sulistyawati, R. (2024). Knowledge transfer and business transformation in Indonesian SOEs. Journal of Organizational Change and Development, 17(3), 140–156.

Syukron, A. (2015). Transparency and accountability in decision-making systems: A governance perspective. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 12(2), 177–190.

Tordo, S., Warner, M., Manzano, O., & Anouti, Y. (2013). Local content policies in the oil and gas sector. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-9931-6

Utami, R., Yuliana, T., & Pradana, F. (2024). E-procurement in Indonesia: Integration challenges with sustainability policies. Indonesian Journal of Business and Economics, 15(2), 210–222.

Valentina, D., & Kussusanti, L. (2025). Organizational loyalty in information systems decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics and Technology, 18(1), 45–59.

Yalsika, A., Firmansyah, D., & Putri, A. (2025). Adaptive information systems for regulatory change in public organizations. Journal of Information Policy, 15(1), 65–83.

Yue, H., Zhang, L., & Wang, Y. (2024). Designing crisis dashboards with user-centered principles: Lessons from COVID-19. Information & Management, 61(4), 103704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2023.103704

Zechner, M., Fuchs, R., & Keller, J. (2024). Mixed-reality training dashboards: Enhancing engagement and real-time visualization. Computers in Human Behavior, 150, 107252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107252