Reconstruction of the Regulation on the Validity Period of the Power of Attorney to Charge Mortgage Rights (SKMHT) in MSME Credit to Ensure Legal Certainty

  • Ihsan Ariyanto Wibowo Universitas Negeri Jember, Jember, Indonesia
  • Firman Floranta Adonara Universitas Negeri Jember, Jember, Indonesia
  • Iwan Rachmad Soetijono Universitas Negeri Jember, Jember, Indonesia
Keywords: SKMHT, Time, Period, Regulation

Abstract

The provision of credit to Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) often uses a Power of Attorney to Charge Mortgage Rights (SKMHT) as the initial binding of collateral before making a Deed of Granting Mortgage Rights (APHT). However, the regulation of the SKMHT period creates legal uncertainty, especially regarding Article 15 paragraphs (3) and (4) of the Mortgage Rights Law and banking technical provisions. The ambiguity of norms affects legal protection for creditors and debtors and may cause disputes in executing collateral.This research first analyzes the regulations on the SKMHT period and the vagueness of norms in MSME credit with land collateral. Second, it evaluates the reconstruction of ideal norms for SKMHT period settings to ensure legal certainty and protection in MSME credit practices.The research uses three approaches: the Statute Approach to examine SKMHT regulations, the Conceptual Approach to analyze legal doctrines, and the Comparative Approach to compare legal arrangements or court decisions from other countries.Three legal theories are applied: Legal Certainty Theory to resolve SKMHT term issues, Legal Protection Theory to analyze protection for creditors and debtors, and Responsibility Theory to review obligations of parties in MSME credit.The results show unclear norms cause legal uncertainty, and failure to convert SKMHT into APHT results in nullity. Therefore, reconstruction of SKMHT term norms in MSME credit with land collateral is required to ensure permanent legal force.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abraham Maslow. Motivation and Personality. Jakarta: PPM Pressindo, 2000.

A. P. Parlindungan. Commentary on the Mortgage Law and Its Historical Formation. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 1996.

A. Qirom Syamsudin Meliala. Principles of Contract Law and Its Developments. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2001.

Achmad Ali. Revealing Legal Theory (Legal Theory) and Judicial Prudence (Judicial Prudence) Vol. 1: Initial Understanding. Jakarta: Kencana, 2009.

Adhitya Pratama Nugroho & Agus Yudha Hernoko. “Guarantee Agreements in Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprise Credit.” Education and Development Journal, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2021.

Agnes Arti Citra Putri. “Differences in Interpretation Regarding the Validity Period of the Power of Attorney to Encumber Mortgage (SKMHT) Between Surakarta City and Boyolali Regency Land Offices.” Private Law Journal, March 1, 2013.

Ahmad Zulfikar. “Legal Strength of SKMHT Validity Period in Micro Credit under the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs/National Land Agency Number 22 of 2017.” Wajah Hukum Journal, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2019.

Ahmadi Miru. Contract Law and Contract Drafting. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007.

Ananda Dwi Sasongko Putra, Rakha Bagus Taruna & Monza Riviero Harissa. “Legal Consequences of Registering the Deed of Mortgage if the SKMHT Has Exceeded Its Time Limit.” Journal of Law, Humanities, and Political Sciences, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2024.

Anisa Kartika Sari. “Legal Protection for Mortgage Holders Whose Mortgage Rights Are Not Registered at the Land Office.” Repertorium Journal, Issue 3, 2015.

Ayang Fristia Maulana. “Power of Attorney to Encumber Mortgage on State Land (Case Study of PT X in City Y).” Yuridis Journal, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2017.

Budi Untung. Banking Credit in Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset, 2000.

Dyah Ochtorina Susanti & A’an Efendi. Legal Research (Legal Research). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015.

Esmi Warasih. Law and Society. Semarang: Pustaka Magister, 2014.

Firman Floranta Adonara. Pillars of The Law of Obligations. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2021.

Frans Winata in Nova Wijayanti. “Legal Protection for Directors Against Non-Performing Loans in State-Owned Banks Based on the Business Judgment Rule Doctrine.” RechtIdee, Faculty of Law, Airlangga University, Vol. 14, No. 1, June 2019.

Hernold Ferry Makawimbang. Understanding and Avoiding Acts Harmful to State Finances in Corruption Crimes and Money Laundering. Yogyakarta: Thafa Media, 2015.

HM Arba & D. A. Mulada. Mortgage Law: Mortgages on Land and Objects Attached to the Land. East Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara (Sinar Grafika), 2022.

Civil Code (Burgerlijk Wetboek), Staatsblad No. 23 of 1847.

Law Number 2 of 2014 on Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 on the Office of Notary.

Law Number 10 of 1998 on Amendments to Law Number 7 of 1992 on Banking.

Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs/National Land Agency Number 22 of 2017 on Determination of the Validity Period for Power of Attorney to Encumber Mortgage (SKMHT) for Securing Certain Loans.

Published
2026-04-27
How to Cite
Wibowo, I. A., Adonara, F. F., & Soetijono, I. R. (2026). Reconstruction of the Regulation on the Validity Period of the Power of Attorney to Charge Mortgage Rights (SKMHT) in MSME Credit to Ensure Legal Certainty. Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 9(1), 10232-10241. https://doi.org/10.31538/iijse.v9i1.9048