AN ANALYSIS OF PERCEIVED CREDIBILITY AND SHARIA COMPLIANCE IN DIGITAL FINANCIAL APPLICATIONS

  • Muhamad Farid Al Fathdry Universitas Tazkia, Bogor, Indonesia
  • Ries Wulandari Universitas Tazkia, Bogor, Indonesia
Keywords: Digital Financial Applications, Analytic Network Process, Sharia Compliance, Platform Credibility, Financial Technology

Abstract

The digital transformation in the financial sector presents complex challenges regarding platform credibility and sharia compliance, particularly for service providers operating in a two-sided market ecosystem. This study aims to deconstruct provider perceptions regarding application credibility defined through cost transparency and security as well as sharia compliance, and how these factors influence adoption and retention decisions. Using the Analytic Network Process (ANP) method, this research synthesizes assessments from five experts (academics and practitioners) to map problem and solution priorities within the Indonesian Islamic digital finance ecosystem. The findings indicate that internal problems, specifically system security aspects (weight 0.466), are the primary priority, preceding cost transparency and sharia compliance. Conversely, the most effective solutions are external, where the publication of verified track records through independent audits and certifications (weight 0.652) is considered the most critical determinant for user retention sustainability. These results imply that a sharia label alone is insufficient; platform providers must invest in external validation mechanisms to overcome information asymmetry and build long-term trust.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adnan, M. F., Efendi, E. N., Asyraf Zamri, M. W., Ridwan, N., & Yusoff, Y. (2025). Factors Influencing User Retention and User Experience in Malaysian Fintech. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, IX(III), 3259–3272. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.90300255

AFTECH. (2023). Annual Members Survey 2022-2023. https://fintech.id/id/knowledge-hub/aftech-annual-members-survey-20222023-bahasa-indonesia

Ahmed, W., Al-Sharafi, M. A., Raza, A., Al-Zaeemi, S. A. S., Al-Bashrawi, M. A., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2026). A longitudinal big data approach to theorizing consumers’ continuance intention to use loyalty apps. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 88, 104453. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRETCONSER.2025.104453

Arner, D. W., Barberis, J. N., & Buckley, R. P. (2015). The Evolution of Fintech: A New Post-Crisis Paradigm? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2676553

Ascarya, A., & Sakti, A. (2022). Designing micro-fintech models for Islamic micro financial institutions in Indonesia. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 15(2), 236–254. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-05-2020-0233

Banna, H., Kabir Hassan, M., & Rashid, M. (2021). Fintech-based financial inclusion and bank risk-taking: Evidence from OIC countries. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 75, 101447. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INTFIN.2021.101447

Czechowska, I. D., & Paduszyńska, M. (2025). The Role of Trust in Fintech Adoption and Development: Bibliometric Analysis. Procedia Computer Science, 270, 2790–2798. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCS.2025.09.401

Farooq, M. S., Khan, M., & Abid, A. (2020). A framework to make charity collection transparent and auditable using blockchain technology. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2020.106588

Ferilli, G. B., Altunbas, Y., Stefanelli, V., Palmieri, E., & Boscia, V. (2024). Fintech governance and performance: Implications for banking and financial stability. Research in International Business and Finance, 70, 102349. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RIBAF.2024.102349

Gomber, P., Kauffman, R. J., Parker, C., & Weber, B. W. (2018). On the Fintech Revolution: Interpreting the Forces of Innovation, Disruption, and Transformation in Financial Services. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(1), 220–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1440766

Hakim, M. A., & Supriyanto, A. (2024). Sharia Fintech and Gen Z: The Mediating Role of Perceived Usefulness. Share: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan Islam, 13(1), 322–346. https://doi.org/10.22373/SHARE.V13I1.22990

Hasan, R., Hassan, M. K., & Aliyu, S. (2020). Fintech and Islamic Finance: Literature Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance (IJIEF), 3(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.18196/ijief.2122

Laldin, M. A., & Furqani, H. (2019). Fintech and Islamic finance: Setting the Sharī‘ah parameters. In Fintech in Islamic Finance: Theory and Practice (1st ed., pp. 113–119). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351025584-8/FINTECH-ISLAMIC-FINANCE-MOHAMAD-AKRAM-LALDIN-HAFAS-FURQANI

Lutfiah, I. N. (2024). Navigating Between Innovation and Compliance: The Challenges of Sharia Fintech Implementation in Indonesia’s Financial Ecosystem. Demak Universal Journal of Islam and Sharia, 2(03), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.61455/deujis.v2i03.130

Nurmara, M. A. K., Hakim, M. N., Ardy, O. H. C., Jeffrey, R., Setiono, V. A., Kanigoro, B., & Irwansyah, E. (2023). A Review of Security in Financial Technology. Procedia Computer Science, 227, 958–965. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCS.2023.10.603

Oseni, U. A., Ali, S. N., Oseni, U. A., & Nazim Ali, S. (2019). Fintech in Islamic finance. In Fintech In Islamic Finance (Issue July). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351025584-1

Ozili, P. K. (2018). Impact of digital finance on financial inclusion and stability. Borsa Istanbul Review, 18(4), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIR.2017.12.003

Parker, Geoffrey., Van Alstyne, Marshall., & Choudary, S. Paul. (2017). Platform revolution : How networked markets are transforming the economy - and how to make them work for you. W. W. Norton & Company.

PBI. (2017). Peraturan Bank Indonesia tentang Penyelenggaraan Teknologi Finansial. PBI No.19/12/PBI/2017. Gubernur Bank Indonesia.

Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor 18/40/PBI/2016 Tahun 2016 Tentang Penyelenggaraan Pemrosesan Transaksi Pembayaran, Pub. L. No. 18/40/PBI/2016, Bank Indonesia (2016). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/135749/peraturan-bi-no-1840pbi2016-tahun-2016

Peraturan Pemerintah (PP) Nomor 71 Tahun 2019 Tentang Penyelenggaraan Sistem Dan Transaksi Elektronik, Pub. L. No. Nomor 71 Tahun 2019, Pemerintah Indonesia (2019). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/122030/pp-no-71-tahun-2019

POJK No, 77 2016 on Information Technology-Based Peer to Peer Lending Services, Pub. L. No. 77, OJK (2016). https://ojk.go.id/id/regulasi/Pages/POJK-tentang-Layanan-Pinjam-Meminjam-Uang-Berbasis-Teknologi-Informasi.aspx

POJK Nomor 13 /POJK.02/2018 Tentang Inovasi Keuangan Digital Di Sektor Jasa Keuangan (2018).

POJK Number 10 /POJK.05/2022 Concerning Information Technology-Based Joint Funding Services, Pub. L. No. No. 10, OJK 1 (2022). https://ojk.go.id/id/regulasi/Documents/Pages/Layanan-Pendanaan-Bersama-Berbasis-Teknologi-Informasi/POJK%2010%20-%2005%20-%202022.pdf

Rabbani, M. R., Khan, S., & Thalassinos, E. I. (2020). FinTech, Blockchain and Islamic Finance: An Extensive Literature Review. International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), VIII(2), 65–86. https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/ijebaa/vviiiy2020i2p65-86.html

Ramadhan, D. S. (2022). Financial Technology and Sharia Compliance Regulations in Islamic Banking in Indonesia. Al-Arbah Journal of Islamic Finance and Banking, 4(2), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.21580/al-arbah.2022.4.2.15647

Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. (2006a). Decision making with the analytic network process. Economic, political, social and technological applications with benefits, opportunities, costs and risks (Vol. 95). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-33987-6

Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2006b). Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process. In Decision making with the analytic network process. Economic, political, social and technological applications with benefits, opportunities, costs and risks (Vol. 195, Issue August, p. pp.1-26). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7279-7

Secinaro, S., Lanzalonga, F., Oppioli, M., & de Nuccio, E. (2025). The effects of disruptive technologies on accountability in fintech industry: Using bibliometric analysis to develop a research agenda. Research in International Business and Finance, 76, 102816. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RIBAF.2025.102816

Sudarwanto, A. S., Kharisma, D. B., & Cahyaningsih, D. T. (2024). Islamic crowdfunding and Shariah compliance regulation: problems and oversight. Journal of Financial Crime, 31(4), 1022–1036. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-01-2023-0003/FULL/XML

Unal, I. M., & Aysan, A. F. (2022). Fintech, Digitalization, and Blockchain in Islamic Finance: Retrospective Investigation. FinTech, 1(4), 388–398. https://doi.org/10.3390/fintech1040029

Undang-Undang (UU) Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 Tentang Pelindungan Data Pribadi, Pub. L. No. No. 27 Tahun 2022, Pemerintah Indonesia (2022). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/229798/uu-no-27-tahun-2022

Usman, H., Projo, N. W. K., Chairy, C., & Haque, M. G. (2021). The exploration role of Sharia compliance in technology acceptance model for e-banking (case: Islamic bank in Indonesia). Journal of Islamic Marketing, 13(5), 1089–1110. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-08-2020-0230

Zulkarnaen, D., Mukhlisin, M., & Eko Pramono, S. (2021). Can Blockchain Technology Improve Accountability and Transparency of Cash Waqf in Indonesia? Journal of Economic Impact, 3(3), 158–166. https://doi.org/10.52223/jei3032105

Published
2026-07-01
How to Cite
Al Fathdry, M., & Wulandari, R. (2026). AN ANALYSIS OF PERCEIVED CREDIBILITY AND SHARIA COMPLIANCE IN DIGITAL FINANCIAL APPLICATIONS. Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 9(2), 16283-16301. Retrieved from https://e-journal.uac.ac.id/index.php/iijse/article/view/9562