Academic Behavior from the Perspective of the Fraud Hexagon Theory (An Empirical Study of Master’s Degree Accounting Students in South Kalimantan Province)

  • Audri Helmina Putri Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Banjarmasin, Indonesia
  • Ade Adriani Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Banjarmasin, Indonesia
  • Rahma Yuliani Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Banjarmasin, Indonesia
Keywords: Academic Fraud, Academic Behavior, Fraud Hexagon Theory, Accounting Students, Higher Education

Abstract

This study examines academic behavior from the perspective of the Fraud Hexagon Theory, which includes pressure, opportunity, rationalization, capability, arrogance, and collusion. The purpose of this research is to analyze the influence of these six factors on academic fraud behavior among Master’s degree students in Accounting in South Kalimantan Province. This study employs a quantitative approach using primary data collected through questionnaires distributed to Accounting postgraduate students. The data were analyzed using statistical techniques to test the proposed hypotheses. The results indicate that pressure, opportunity, rationalization, capability, arrogance, and collusion have varying effects on academic fraud behavior, either individually or simultaneously. These findings provide empirical evidence that the Fraud Hexagon Theory can be applied to explain academic misconduct in higher education. This study is expected to contribute to the development of academic integrity policies and preventive strategies to reduce academic fraud in postgraduate education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aditantra, J. W., & Chariri, A. (2023). Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Dalam Perspektif Fraud Hexagon. Jurnal Akademi Akuntansi, 6(4), 634–654. Https://Doi.Org/10.22219/Jaa.V6i4.30208

Alberto, D., Serra, A.-A., Sulmon, C., Gouesbet, G., & Couée, I. (2016). Herbicide- Related Signaling In Plants Reveals Novel Insights For Herbicide Use Strategies, Environmental Risk Assessment And Global Change Assessment Challenges. Science Of The Total Environment.

Amheka, A., Higano, Y., Tanesab, J., & Tuati, N. (2019). Energy Transformation And Ghg Emission Reduction Model : An Empirical Strategy For Kupang City , Ntt Province , Indonesia. June.

Apriliana, S., & Agustina, L. (2017). The Analysis Of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Determinant Through Fraud Pentagon Approach. 9(2), 154–165.

Apsari, A. K., & Suhartini, D. (2021). Religiosity As Moderating Of Accounting Student Academic Fraud With A Hexagon Theory Approach. 1(3), 211–230. Https://Doi.Org/10.47153/Afs13.1512021

Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., Beasley, M. S., Hogan, C. E., Goldstein, A., & Bateman, J. (2014). Auditing And Assurance Services An Integrated Approach Seventeenth Edition. 1–27.

Christiana, A., Kristiani, A., & Pangestu, S. (2021). Kecurangan Pembelajaran Daring Pada Awal Pandemi: Dimensi Fraud Pentagon. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 19(1), 66–83. Https://Doi.Org/10.21831/Jpai.V19i1.40734

Fadersair, K., & Subagyo. (2019). Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa Akuntansi : Dimensi Fraud Pentagon (Studi Kasus Pada Mahasiswa Prodi Akuntansi Ukrida). 12(2), 122–147.

Fransiska, I. S., & Utami, H. (2019). Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa : Perspektif Fraud Diamond Theory. 6(2), 316–323.

Fuad, K. (2019). Sudut Pandang Masyarakat Tentang Tingkat Kepatuhan Pajak Di Jepara. 12(3), 378–394. Https://Doi.Org/10.22441/Profita.2019.V12.03.002

Fuadi, M. (2016). Determinan Kecurangan Akademik Pada Mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Semarang Dengan Konsep Fraud Triangle.

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariat Dengan Program Ibm Spss 25 (9th Ed.). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Indriantoro, N., & Supomo, B. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis Untuk Akuntansi Dan Manajemen. 15, 65–70.

Isbahi, M. B., Zuana, M. M. M., & Toha, M. (2024). The Multi-Social Relation of the Cattle Industry in the Plaosan Subdistrict Animal Market of Magetan Regency. Malacca: Journal of Management and Business Development, 1(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.69965/malacca.v1i1.51

Isnan Murdiansyah, & , Made Nurkholis, S. (2017). Pengaruh Dimensi Fraud Diamond Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik (Studi Empiris Pada Mahasiswa Magister Akuntansi Universitas Brawijaya). Akuntansi Aktual, 4(2), 121–133. Http://Eprints.Ums.Ac.Id/Id/Eprint/90298

Khoirunnisa, A., & Amaroh, S. (2020). Identifikasi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan Yang Listed Di Jakarta Islamic Index 70: Pendekatan Fraud Diamond Theory. 6(1), 67–76.

Moorcy, P. A., Sarwani, S., Suhaili, A., & Rasidah, R. (2021). Perspektif Fraud Hexagon Theory Dalam Perilaku Academic Fraud: Studi Explanatory Pada Mahasiswa Akuntansi. Owner, 8(1), 130–142. Https://Doi.Org/10.33395/Owner.V8i1.2068

Nainggolan, P. (2020). Perilaku Academic Fraud Dari Sudut Pandang Fraud triangle dan idealisme dari prespektif orientasi etika pada mahasiswa akuntansi di indonesia. Seminar nasional akuntansi (sena) iii, 163–190.

Permatasari, d. (2021). Fraud pentagon sebagai alat pendeteksi financial statement Fraud : literatur review. Jurnal ilmiah mahasiswa ekonomi akuntansi (jimeka), 6(4), 1.

Rahmadina, l. H. (2020). Fraud triangle sebagai motif niat melakukan kecurangan akademik.

Ramdhani, n. (2011). Penyusunan alat pengukur berbasis Theory Of Planned Behavior 1. 19(2), 55–69.

Rangkuti, a. A. (2011). Academic cheating behaviour of accounting students : a case study in jakarta state university.

Sekaran, u., & bougie, r. (2022). Metode penelitian untuk bisnis: pendekatan pengembangan-keahlian (6th ed.). Salemba empat.

Solihat, W. M., Hermawan, Y., Roro, R., Nurdianti, S., Ekonomi, J. P., & Siliwangi, U. (2023). Pengaruh tekanan, kesempatan, rasionalisasi, kemampuan, dan arogansi terhadap perilaku kecurangan akademik mahasiswa pendidikan ekonomi. 1(3), 285–305.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kombinasi (mix methods). Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Winardi, r. D., mustikarini, a., & anggraeni, m. A. (2017). Academic dishonesty among accounting students: some indonesian evidence. Management and accounting review, 17(1), 19–45. Https://doi.org/10.24191/mar.v17i1.579

Wahyuningsih, N., Anwar, K., & Pinandita, M. K. (2024). Peran Audit Internal dalam Pencegahan dan Deteksi Fraud pada Universitas Negeri Semarang sebagai Perguruan Tinggi Negeri Badan Hukum. Co-Value Jurnal Ekonomi Koperasi dan kewirausahaan, 15(7).

Putra, D. H. A. (2019, March 14). 3 Skandal Kebohongan di Dunia Akademik Indonesia. Kumparan. https://kumparan.com/kumparannews/3-skandal-kebohongan-di-dunia-akademik-indonesia

Duhita, S. (2019, March 14). Kelindan kebohongan HDS ‘Krimi’ eks mahasiswa UI. Kumparan. https://kumparan.com/kumparannews/kelindan-kebohongan-hds-krimi-eks-mahasiswa-ui

Greenspan, R. E. (2019). College Admissions Scandal: All of the Latest Developments. Retrieved from https://time.com/5549921/college-admissions-bribery-scandal/

Media, K. C. (2020). Dosen WNI Hukum 300 Mahasiswa di Australia karena Mencontek. Retrieved from https://www.kompas.com/global/read/2020/12/22/181243470/dosen-wni-hukum-300-mahasiswa-di-australia-karena-mencontek?page=all

Yulianti, C. (2024). 20 Negara Terbanyak Terbitkan Artikel di Jurnal Predator, Indonesia Urutan ke-2. Retrieved from https://www.detik.com/edu/detikpedia/d-7429600/20-negara-terbanyak-terbitkan-artikel-di-jurnal-predator-indonesia-urutan-ke-2

Published
2026-04-27
How to Cite
Putri, A. H., Adriani, A., & Yuliani, R. (2026). Academic Behavior from the Perspective of the Fraud Hexagon Theory (An Empirical Study of Master’s Degree Accounting Students in South Kalimantan Province). Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 9(1), 10189-10199. https://doi.org/10.31538/iijse.v9i1.9728