The Dilemma of Applying Authentic Assessment to Aqidah Akhlak Subjects

Saibatul Hamdi; Muslimah Muslimah

doi:10.31538/nzh.v5i3.2211

Saibatul Hamdi Pascasarjana IAIN Palangka Raya
Muslimah Muslimah Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palangka Raya, Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v5i3.2211

Keywords: Dilemma, Autentic Assesment, Akidah Akhlak

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe: (1) describe the implementation of the assessment carried out by Akidah Akhlak teachers; (2) identify the factors that cause the teacher's dilemma in carrying out authentic assessments on the subject of Akidah Akhlak. The approach used in this study is a descriptive qualitative approach. Data collection techniques using interviews, observation, and documentation. The data validation technique uses source and technique triangulation. While the data analysis technique uses the Miles and Huberman model. The results of this study indicate that: (1) the implementation of authentic assessment on Akidah Akhlak subjects at MA Sabilal Muhtadin has not been carried out optimally, it can be seen from teachers who only provide assessments on cognitive aspects through written tests, while psychomotor aspects have not been carried out. As for the affective aspect, the teacher carried out observations but did not use instruments. (2) The dilemma of teachers in carrying out authentic assessments is caused by three main factors, namely minimal resources, the dogma of the KTSP assessment that is still strong, and the busy factor coupled with the shortening of offline learning time during the pandemic. The implementation of the assessment should be supported by various parties by improving the quality of existing resources as an effort to improve Islamic Education Subject assessment in madrasas.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, Ramli. “Urgensi Penilaian Hasil Belajar Berbasis Kelas pada Mata Pelajaran IPS di Madrasah Tsanawiyah.” Lantanida Journal 3, no. 2 (2015): 168–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/lj.v3i2.1657.

Anggito, Albi, dan Johan Setiawan. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Jawa Barat: CV Jejak Publisher, 2018.

Astuti, Efi Tri. “Problematika Implementasi Penilaian Autentik Kurikulum 2013 dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di SD Negeri Ploso I Pacitan.” Al-Idaroh: Jurnal Studi Manajemen Pendidikan Islam 1, no. 2 (2017): 18–41. https://jurnal.stituwjombang.ac.id/index.php/al-idaroh/article/view/17.

Astuty, Widy, dan Abdul Wachid Bambang Suharto. “Desain Perencanaan Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Daring dengan Kurikulum Darurat.” Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam 9, no. 1 (2021): 81–96. https://doi.org/10.36667/jppi.v9i1.624.

Bramma Aji Putra. “Ini Persamaan dan Penyempurnaan Kurikulum PAI dan Bahasa Arab Madrasah.” Kemenag.go.id, 2019. https://diy.kemenag.go.id/7193-ini-persamaan-dan-penyempurnaan-kurikulum-pai-dan-bahasa-arab-madrasah.html.

Erwinsyah, Alfian. “Manajemen Pembelajaran Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Peningkatan Kualitas Guru.” Tadbir: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam 5, no. 1 (2017): 69–84. http://journal.iaingorontalo.ac.id/index.php/tjmpi/article/view/517.

Fanani, Moh Zainal. “Strategi Pengembangan Soal HOTS pada Kurikulum 2013.” Edudeena: Journal of Islamic Religious Education 2, no. 1 (2018): 57–76. https://doi.org/ttps://doi.org/10.30762/ed.v2i1.582.

Firdaus, dan Fakhry Zamzam. Aplikasi Metodologi Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Deepublish Publisher, 2018.

Hartuti, Miranti, dan Diana Endah Handayani. “Analisis Penilaian Kognitif Kurikulum 2013 di Kelas Rendah.” El-Ibtidaiy: Journal of Primary Education 2, no. 1 (2019): 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/ejpe.v2i1.7370.

Higgins, Martyn. “Evaluations of Social Work Education: A Critical Review.” Social Work Education 34, no. 7 (3 Oktober 2015): 771–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2015.1068284.

Imania, Kuntum Annisa, dan Siti Khusnul Bariah. “Rancangan Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Pembelajaran Berbasis Daring.” Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi 5, no. 1 (2019): 31–47. https://doi.org/10.31980/jpetik.v5i1.445.

Islam, Syaiful. “Karakteristik Pendidikan Karakter; Menjawab Tantangan Multidimensional Melalui Implementasi Kurikulum 2013.” Edureligia 1, no. 1 (2017): 89–101. https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.33650/edureligia.v1i2.50.

Kontovourki, Stavroula, Stavroula Philippou, dan Eleni Theodorou. “Curriculum making as professionalism-in-context: the cases of two elementary school teachers amidst curriculum change in Cyprus.” The Curriculum Journal 29, no. 2 (3 April 2018): 257–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2018.1447308.

Mardawani. Praktis Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Deepublish Publisher, 2020.

McMorran, Chris, Kiruthika Ragupathi, dan Simei Luo. “Assessment and learning without grades? Motivations and concerns with implementing gradeless learning in higher education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42, no. 3 (3 April 2017): 361–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1114584.

Musfiqon, H.M. Penilaian Otentik dalam Pembelajaran Kurikulum 2013. Sidorarjo: Nizamia Learning Center, 2016.

Nurhadi. “Transformasi Teori Kognitivisme dalam Belajar dan Pembelajaran.” Bintang : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Sains 2, no. 1 (2020): 16–34. https://doi.org/10.36088/bintang.v2i1.540.

Pretorius, Lynette. “Experiential and self-discovery learning in digital literacy: Developing the discernment to evaluate source reliability.” College & Undergraduate Libraries 25, no. 4 (2 Oktober 2018): 388–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2018.1530626.

Renshaw, Carl E. “Design and Assessment of a Skills-Based Geoscience Curriculum.” Journal of Geoscience Education 62, no. 4 (19 November 2018): 668–78. https://doi.org/10.5408/13-100.1.

Riscaputantri, Anggarwati, dan Sri Wening. “Pengembangan instrumen penilaian afektif siswa kelas IV sekolah dasar di Kabupaten Klaten.” Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan 22, no. 2 (2018): 231–42. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v22i2.16885.

Sa’adah, Elvi Nur Lailatus, dan Darsono Sigit. “Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Sikap dan Keterampilan Psikomotorik pada Materi Elektrokimia.” Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, & Pengembangan 3, no. 8 (2018): 1023–26. https://doi.org/DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i8.11405.

Said, Amad, dan Muslimah. “Evaluation of Learning Outcomes of Moral Faith Subjects during Covid-19 Pandemic at MIN East Kotawaringin.” Bulletin of Science Education 1, no. 1 (2021): 7–15.

Sofyan, Fuaddilah Ali. “Implementasi HOTS pada Kurikulum 2013.” Inventa: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar 3, no. 1 (2019): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.36456/inventa.3.1.a1803.

Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2018.

Teluma, Mariyati, dan Wanto Rivaie. Penilaian. Kalimantan Barat: PGRI Provinsi Kalbar, 2019.

Umami, Muzlikhatun. “Penilaian Autentik Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Budi Pekerti dalam Kurikulum 2013.” Jurnal Kependidikan 6, no. 2 (2018): 222–32. https://doi.org/10.24090/jk.v6i2.2259.

Vaughn, Margaret, Roya Q. Scales, Elizabeth Y. Stevens, Sonia Kline, Jennifer Barrett-Tatum, Ann Van Wig, Karen K. Yoder, dan Debra Wellman. “Understanding literacy adoption policies across contexts: a multi-state examination of literacy curriculum decision-making.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 53, no. 3 (4 Mei 2021): 333–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2019.1683233.

Violato, Efrem, dan Sharla King. “Disruption and innovation in interprofessional attitude assessment.” Journal of Interprofessional Care 35, no. 3 (4 Mei 2021): 325–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2020.1758045.

Yunita, Luki, Dedi Irwandi, dan Diah Ayu Pertiwi. “Penggunaan Instrumen Penilaian Psikomotor Siswa Pada Praktikum Kimia Berbasis Kurikulum 2013.” Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Kimia 7, no. 2 (2017): 85–90. https://doi.org/10.21009/JRPK.072.01.