Regulatory Oversight, Firm Characteristics, and Audit Quality: Evidence From Indonesia’s Post Pandemic Energy Sector

  • Siwi Rawidya Estri Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Ifah Rofiqoh Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Keywords: Audit Quality, Audit Tenure, Audit Rotation, Firm Size, Audit Committee, Corporate Governance, Energy Sector

Abstract

Regulatory transformation and increasing reporting complexity in Indonesia’s post pandemic energy sector highlight the need for a clearer understanding of the factors that influence audit quality. Previous studies report inconsistent findings regarding the effects of audit tenure, audit rotation, firm size, and the audit committee’s effectiveness, raising the question of whether auditor characteristics or client characteristics play a more dominant role. This study aims to examine the effects of audit tenure, audit rotation, and firm size on audit quality and to evaluate whether the audit committee moderates these relationships in energy companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. A quantitative approach was employed using purposive sampling, resulting in 46 sample firms observed from 2021 to 2024. Logistic regression was used to analyze audit quality proxied by audit opinion. The results show that audit tenure and audit rotation have no significant effect on audit quality, while firm size exhibits a strong and significant positive effect. Moreover, the audit committee does not moderate the relationship between the independent variables and audit quality. These findings indicate that in a strengthened regulatory environment characterized by intensified OJK oversight and consistent SPAP enforcement client characteristics, particularly firm size, play a more decisive role in determining audit quality than auditor characteristics. Theoretically, this study refines agency theory within mature regulatory settings, and practically, it offers guidance for auditor oversight policies, and corporate governance enhancement in the energy sector.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbar, T. (2017). Pengaruh Time Budget Pressure, Tenure Audit, dan Rotasi Audit Terhadap Kualitas Audit. 10(3), 634. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22441/journal%20profita.v10i3.2843

Aprilady, S., Nasir, A., Hasan, M. A., Natariasari, R., Akuntansi, P. S., & Riau, U. (2023). Kualitas Audit Ditinjau Dari Independensi, Audit Tenure, Audit Fee Dan Due Professional Care. 4(2), 356–368. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31258/current.4.2.356-368

Ardiansyah, A., Muhsin, M., & Helmi, S. M. (2024). Pengaruh Reputasi Kap, Biaya Audit, Dan Rotasi Auditor Pada Kualitas Audit Dengan Pemoderasi Komite Audit. Sebatik, 28(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46984/sebatik.v28i1.2453

Effendi, E., & Ulhaq, R. D. (2021). Pengaruh Audit Tenur, Reputasi Auditor, Ukuran Perusahaan Dan Komite Audit. Penerbit Adab. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=o3Y-Eaaaqbaj

Halim, Y. C. (2018). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Audit Report Lag Periode 2013-2016 Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 2(1), 54–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24912/jmieb.v2i1.1655

Martani, D., Rahmah, N. A., Fitriany, F., & Anggraita, V. (2021). Cogent Economics & Finance Impact of audit tenure and audit rotation on the audit quality : Big 4 vs non big 4 Impact of audit tenure and audit rotation on the audit quality : Big 4 vs non big 4. Cogent Economics & Finance, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2021.1901395

Mauliana, E., & Laksito, H. (2021). Pengaruh Fee Audit, Audit Tenure, Rotasi Audit, dan Reputasi Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit. 10(1981), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2012.v16.i1.147

Nguyen, Q. M., Nguyen, C. V, Minh, Q., & Nguyenb, C. V. (2024). Machine Translated by Google Cogent Economics & Finance Tata kelola perusahaan , kualitas audit dan kinerja perusahaan – bukti empiris Tata kelola perusahaan , kualitas audit dan kinerja perusahaan – bukti empiris. 2039. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2024.2334128

Pamungkas, S. A., Purnamasari, D. I., & Widyastuti, W. (2022). Current Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi dan Bisnis Terkini. Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Terkini, 3(1), 438–457. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31258/current.3.2.166-175

Paputungan, R. D., & Kaluge, D. (2018). Pengaruh Masa Perikatan Audit, Rotasi Audit Dan Ukuran Kantor Akuntan Publik Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 8(1), 93–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v8i1.29

Prasetia, I. F., & Rozali, R. D. Y. (2016). Pengaruh Tenure Audit, Rotasi Audit, dan Reputasi KAP Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset, 10(1), 105–112. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/aset/article/view/4020/2889

Prihandoko, D. H. (2020). The role of auditor opinion in moderating the effect of financial distress on auditor switching in the infrastructure , utility , and transportation sub-sectors. 10(1), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.14414/tiar.v10i1.2033

Putri, A. N., & Pohan, H. T. (2022). Pengaruh Audit Tenure, Rotasi Audit, dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Kualitas Audit. 2(2), 919–928. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.25105/jet.v2i2.14728

Rahayu, Y. P., & Yendrawati, R. (2025). Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia Corporate Social Responsibility disclosure : A study on audit committee , audit quality , and company size. 29(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20885/jaai.vol29.iss1.art15

Rahmadini, W., & Fauzihardani, E. (2022). Pengaruh Audit Fee, Tekanan Anggaran Waktu, dan Rotasi Audit Terhadap Kualitas Audit dengan Pengalaman Auditor sebagai Variabel Moderating. 4(3), 530–544. http://jea.ppj.unp.ac.id/index.php/jea/article/download/551/371http://jea.ppj.unp.ac.id/index.php/jea/article/download/551/371

Tabsyir, M. (2025). The Effect of Audit Tenure , Audit Rotation , and Audit Delay on Audit Quality with Audit Committee as a Moderating Variable. 13(5), 1215–1226. https://doi.org/10.37641/jiakes.v13i5.4171

Wahyu, W. (2020). Pengaruh Client importance, tenure audit, rotasi audit dan Fee Audit Terhadap Kualitas Audit dan Komite Audit sebagai Variabel Moderasi. 12(2), 117–129. https://ejournal.unri.ac.id/pekbis-jurnal-pendidikan-ekonomi-dan-bisnis/

Widiastuti, A. N., & Rofiqoh, I. (2024). Causes of Audit Report Lag with Reputation of Audit Firm as a Moderating Variable. IJBE (Integrated Journal of Business and Economics), 8(3), 364. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33019/ijbe.v8i3.1061

Zuana, M. M. M., Toha, M., & Isbahi, M. B. (2024). Exploration of Community Empowerment in a Village as the Entrance to a Lake in East Java. Malacca: Journal of Management and Business Development , 1(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.69965/malacca.v1i1.52

Published
2026-03-30
How to Cite
Estri, S., & Rofiqoh, I. (2026). Regulatory Oversight, Firm Characteristics, and Audit Quality: Evidence From Indonesia’s Post Pandemic Energy Sector. Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 9(1), 8459-8474. https://doi.org/10.31538/iijse.v9i1.9213