PEMBACAAN KONTEKSTUAL “EKSEGESIS” DALAM TEKS KEAGAMAAN
Abstract
Religious texts are believed to be hudan li annas containing universal values. Universal principles are believed to be relevant in every tempus and locus. This assumption implies that universal principles can be used as a foundation and implemented in order to answer contemporary problems and the demands of the times that are temporal and particular. The logical consequence that the universal meaning of the text rests on lughah (linguistic). The presence of a text that relies on linguistics gives birth to a variety of readings with interpretation methods that continue to change and develop along with the complexity of the problems faced by society which determine meaning. The discourse on the production of meaning starts from understanding whether the text is a closed corpus, so that the meaning of the text is immutable (absolute, absolute, eternal), or the text is an open corpus, so that the text is mutable (dynamic, complex). Two readings have been born as a representation of the understanding of the meaning of the text. Textualism was born with the understanding that interpretation in the production of the meaning of text must rely on the literal meaning of the text. This is believed to be able to maintain the stability of the meaning contained, and keep away from subjectivity in the process of exegesis. Contrary to contextualism, it emphasizes the socio-historical and cultural aspects of language. In contextualism view, that context plays an important role in the exegesis process to determine meaning.
Downloads
References
----------- Saeed, Islamic Thought; An Introduction, New York; Routladge, 2006.
----------- Saeed, The Qur’an; An Introduction, New York; Routladge, 2008.
----------- Saeed, Reading the Qur’an in the Twenty-first Century A Contextualist Approach, New York: Routledge, 2014.
Abdul Mustaqim, Epistemologi Tafsir Kontemporer, Yogyakarta: PT LKiS Printing Cemerlang, 2010.
Bob Hale and Crispin Wrigth (ed.), Acompanian to The Philoshopy of Language, Oxford: Black Well Publisher, 1999.
Christopher Norris, Membongkar Teori Dekonstruksi Jacques Derrida, Yogyakarta: ar-Ruzz, 2003.
Farid Esack, Qur’an, Liberation and Pluralism, Oxford: Oneworld Publication, 1997.
Harold H. Titus, Living Issues in Philosophy: An Introduction Text-book, New York: t.p., 1959.
Muhammad Abduh, Fatihah al-Kitab, Kairo: Kitab al-Tahrir, 1382 H.
Muhammad Arkoun, Al-Fikr al-Ushuli wa Istihalah at-Ta’shil: Nahwa Tarikh Akhar li al-Fikr al-Islami, Beirut: Dar al-Saqi, 2002.
M.F. Zenrif, Sintesis paradigma Studi Al-Qur’an, Malain Press, 2008.
Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd, Mafhum an-Nash: Dirasat fi ‘Ulum Al-Qur’an, Kairo: al-Hay’ah al-Mishriyyah al-‘Amanah li al-Kitab, 1993.
Suryadilaga, M. Alfatih dkk, Metodologi Ilmu Tafsir, Teras Yogyakarta, 2005.
U. Syarifuddin, Paradigma Tafsir Tekstual dan Kontekstual; Usaha Memaknai Kembali Pesan Al-Qur’an, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2009.
Yusuf Qaradhawi, Dirasah fi Fiqhi Maqasid al-Syariah baina al-Maqasid al-Kulliyah wa al-Nusus al-Juz’iyyah, Kairo: Dar al-Syuruq, 2006.
Yudian Wahyudi, “Hasan Hanafi on Salafism and Secularism”, dalam Ibrahim Abu Rabi’ (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Contemporary Islamic Thought, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2006.
.png)
