Pengembangan Portal Digital Layanan Aduan Online sebagai Instrumen Partisipasi Publik di Kalangan Masyarakat Nahdiyin PCINU Malaysia

Digital Complaint Service Portal Development as a Medium of Public Participation: A Case Study of the Nahdliyin Community in PCINU Malaysia

  • Fadly Usman Department Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota, Universitas Brawijaya
  • Indradi Wijatmiko Departemen Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Brawijaya
  • Teguh Utomo Department Teknik Elektro, Universitas Brawijaya
  • Achfaz Zacoeb Department Teknik Sipil, Universitas Brawijaya
  • Noviani Suryasari Department Teknik Arsitektur, Universitas Brawijaya
  • Zakariyah - Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Asep Saifuddin Chalim Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi informasi telah mendorong transformasi pelayanan publik menuju arah digital. Portal Layanan Aduan yang merupakan hasil kolaborasi Badan Penelitoan dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Brawijaya (BPPM FTUB) dan Pengurus Cabang Istimewa Nahdlatul Ulama (PCINU) Malaysia, hadir sebagai sarana aduan dan partisipasi masyarakat diaspora Indonesia khususnya yang berada di Malaysia. Studi ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengembangan dan efektivitas portal tersebut dalam meningkatkan partisipasi warga, khususnya komunitas Nahdliyin di Malaysia. Dengan pendekatan studi kasus kualitatif, data dikumpulkan melalui analisis konten portal, observasi fitur, dan pengumpulan data responden menggunakan google form. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa portal ini mampu menjembatani komunikasi publik dengan organisasi keagamaan secara efisien. Namun demikian, sejumlah tantangan tetap muncul, seperti keterbatasan data statistik pengguna, keamanan informasi, serta belum optimalnya umpan balik digital. Studi ini menyimpulkan bahwa model layanan digital berbasis komunitas diaspora ini dapat direplikasi secara lebih luas jika diikuti dengan peningkatan literasi digital dan infrastruktur keamanan yang terpercaya.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225

Bélanger, F., & Carter, L. (2008). Trust and risk in e government adoption. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.002

Boone, H. N., & Boone, D. A. (2012). Analyzing Likert data. Journal of Extension, 50 (2), 1–5. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/joe/vol50/iss2/2/

Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2008). Diasporas and conflict societies: Conflict, conflict transformation, and development. United States Institute of Peace. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2006.004726

Cavusoglu, H., Mishra, B., & Raghunathan, S. (2004). The effect of internet security breach announcements on market value: Capital market reactions for breached firms and internet security developers. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9(1), 69–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2004.11044320

Chadwick, A., & May, C. (2003). Interaction between states and citizens in the age of the internet: “e-government” in the United States, Britain, and the European Union. Governance, 16(2), 271–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0491.00234

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (4th edition)., SAGE Publications.

Gamlen, A. (2008). The emigration state and the modern geopolitical imagination. Citizenship Studies, 12(6), 543–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621020802362658

ISO 9241–210. (2010). Ergonomics of human–system interaction – Part 210: Human centred design for interactive systems. International Organization for Standardization.

Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22 (140), 1–55

Misuraca, G., Codagnone, C., & Rossel, P. (2011). From practice to theory and back to practice: Reflexivity in measurement and evaluation for evidence-based policy making in the information society. Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.003

Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. Morgan Kaufmann

Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives’ digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016

Redecker, C., Ala-Mutka, K., Bacigalupo, M., Ferrari, A., & Punie, Y. (2010). Learning 2.0 – The impact of social media on learning in Europe. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. https://doi.org/10.2791/40958

Usman, F., Wardhani, J. K., Sari, I. C., & Chalim, S. (2023). Assessing Trauma Healing Methods for Volcanic Disaster Evacuees in Indonesia. Journal Européen Des Systèmes Automatisés, 56(6), 1019–1025. https://doi.org/10.18280/jesa.560612

Vertovec, S. (2004). Migrant transnationalism and modes of transformation. International Migration Review, 38(3), 970–1001. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00226.x

Yulia Amelia Efendi, Ratih Ardianti Ningrum, Yusrizal Afif, Afiani Machmudah, Amalia Sofia, Chandrawati Putri WUlandari (2021). Migrant Worker Empowerment: Literasi Digital untuk Pekerja Migran Indonesia, Airlangga University Press. Diakses 13 Juli 2025

Published
2025-08-02
How to Cite
Usman, F., Wijatmiko, I., Utomo, T., Zacoeb, A., Suryasari, N., -, Z., & Chalim, A. (2025). Pengembangan Portal Digital Layanan Aduan Online sebagai Instrumen Partisipasi Publik di Kalangan Masyarakat Nahdiyin PCINU Malaysia. Al-Mada: Jurnal Agama, Sosial, Dan Budaya, 8(3), 567-576. https://doi.org/10.31538/almada.v8i3.8658