Writing Stages, Evaluation Criteria, and Pedagogical Functions in Maḥmūd Kāmil al-Nāqa's Arabic Writing Instruction: An Integrative Reconstruction for Contemporary Classrooms

Tahapan Menulis, Kriteria Evaluasi, dan Fungsi Pedagogis dalam Pembelajaran Menulis Bahasa Arab menurut Maḥmūd Kāmil al-Nāqah: Rekonstruksi Integratif untuk Pembelajaran Kontemporer

  • Khaerul Muttakin Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga, Indonesia
  • Triani Agustin Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga, Indonesia
  • R Umi Baroroh Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga, Indonesia
  • Ali Jum'ah Rahmatullah Institut Agama Islam Hamzanwadi Lombok Timur, Indonesia
  • Ninda Maharani Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga, Indonesia
  • Abdurrohman Hasan Al-Adawi Saratov State University, Rusia
Keywords: Arabic writing instruction, al-Nāqa, Writing stages, Evaluative pedagogy, Non-native speakers

Abstract

Purpose - This study reconstructs and integrates the writing-instruction framework advanced by Mamūd Kāmil al-Nāqa in Taʿlīm al-Lughah al-ʿArabīyah li-Ghayr al-Nāiqīn bihā, examining how his tripartite model of writing stages, evaluation criteria, and pedagogical functions can be applied in contemporary Arabic language classrooms.

Design/methodology/approach - The study employs qualitative document analysis of al-Nāqa's primary text, supplemented by a purposive analytical review of secondary literature on Arabic writing pedagogy. Four coding categories — writing stages, evaluation orientation, pedagogical function, and contemporary adaptation — guided thematic analysis across both the source text and the scholarly corpus.

Findings/results Al-Nāqa distinguishes three developmentally ordered and overlapping writing stages: al-kitābah al-muwajjahah (guided writing), al-kitābah al-muqayyadah (constrained writing), and al-kitābah al-urrah (free writing). Each stage carries distinct evaluation criteria and a defined pedagogical function within a continuum from linguistic control to expressive autonomy. Within the reviewed corpus, no prior study has produced an integrative reconstruction mapping all three dimensions simultaneously.

Originality/value - The study contributes an integrative pedagogical model (Figure 1) and an adaptation table (Table 4) specifying how each element of al-Nāqa's original framework translates into contemporary classroom practice, including digital and communicative extensions.

Paper type – Conceptual paper

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ainin, M., Asrori, I., & Mujib, F. (2024). Developing an analytic rubric for Arabic writing assessment in Indonesian madrasah contexts. Alsuna: Journal of Arabic and English Language, 7(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.31538/alsuna.v7i1.3821

Al-Ghāmidī, N. A. (2023). Criteria for evaluating Arabic expository writing among non-native speakers: A framework analysis. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 23(2), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes2000.23.2.2023.6

Al-Hāshimī, A. (2009). Asālīb tadrīs al-kitābah al-muwajjahah fī marḥalat al-ibtidāʾīyah. Majallat Kullīyat al-Tarbiyah, 42(1), 77–103.

Al-Nāqa, M. K. (1985). Taʿlīm al-lughah al-ʿArabīyah li-ghayr al-nāṭiqīn bihā: Ususuhu wa-manāhijuhu wa-ṭarāʾiq tadrīsihi. Jāmiʿat Umm al-Qurā.

Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., & Polinsky, M. (2013). Heritage languages and their speakers: Opportunities and challenges for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics, 39(3–4), 129–181. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2013-0009

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (4th ed.). Pearson.

Cumming, A. (2001). Learning to write in a second language: Two decades of research. International Journal of English Studies, 1(2), 1–23.

Cummins, J. (2008). BICS and CALP: Empirical and theoretical status of the distinction. In B. Street & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (Vol. 2, pp. 71–83). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_5

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.

Graham, S., & Sandmel, K. (2011). The process writing approach: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Research, 104(6), 396–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2010.488703

Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford University Press.

Hermawan, A., & Sholeh, M. (2021). Penerapan kitābah al-ḥurrah dalam pembelajaran bahasa Arab di pesantren: Studi kasus. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab dan Kebahasaaraban, 8(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.15408/jpbak.v8i2.21437

Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635547

Ibrahim, A. H., & Wahab, N. A. (2015). Rubric-based evaluation of L2 Arabic writing: Criteria and rater reliability. Arab World English Journal, 6(4), 88–102. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol6no4.7

Khaldieh, S. A. (2019). Writing in Arabic as a foreign language: From theory to practice. Journal of Arabic Linguistics, 31(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.13173/jaraling.31.1.55

Khalil, A., & Mansouri, F. (2021). Arabic L2 writing development in immersion and non-immersion contexts: A longitudinal study. System, 96, 102406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102406

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Mustofa, B., Rusman, T., & Habibi, M. (2019). Pemanfaatan media digital dalam pengembangan keterampilan menulis bahasa Arab di Madrasah Tsanawiyah. Al-Arabiyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab, 15(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.14421/al-arabiyah.2019.151-04

Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815572747

Nuha, U., & Fajri, I. (2023). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian keterampilan menulis bahasa Arab berbasis taksonomi Bloom. Alsuna: Journal of Arabic and English Language, 6(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.31538/alsuna.v6i2.2997

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667305

Ryding, K. C. (2005). A reference grammar of Modern Standard Arabic. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486975

Saputra, H., Wahyudi, I., & Mujib, A. (2022). Efektivitas teknik guided writing dalam meningkatkan keterampilan menulis bahasa Arab mahasiswa. IJAZ Arabi: Journal of Arabic Learning, 5(2), 248–264. https://doi.org/10.18860/ijazarabi.v5i2.16422

Savignon, S. J. (2018). Communicative competence. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0047

Ṭuʿaymah, R. A., & al-Nāqa, M. K. (2010). Taʿlīm al-lughah ittiṣālīyan bayna al-manāhij wa-l-istrātījīyyāt. ISESCO.

Wahab, M. A., Nadhir, M., & Mukhlis, H. (2023). Systematic review of Arabic writing skill studies in Indonesia (2018–2023): Trends and gaps. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpi.2023.91-01

Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511732997

Wildana, W., Fathurrosyid, F., & Bashori, H. (2024). Model pembelajaran kitābah berbasis pendekatan komunikatif di Madrasah Aliyah. Alsuna: Journal of Arabic and English Language, 7(2), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.31538/alsuna.v7i2.4112

Zamel, V. (1982). Writing: The process of discovering meaning. TESOL Quarterly, 16(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586792

Published
2026-05-31
How to Cite
Muttakin, K., Agustin, T., Baroroh, R. U., Rahmatullah, A., Maharani, N., & Al-Adawi, A. (2026). Writing Stages, Evaluation Criteria, and Pedagogical Functions in Maḥmūd Kāmil al-Nāqa’s Arabic Writing Instruction: An Integrative Reconstruction for Contemporary Classrooms. Alsuna: Journal of Arabic and English Language, 9(1), 183-195. https://doi.org/10.31538/alsuna.v9i1.10457